Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30922299›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

"I just have to take it" - patient safety in acute care: perspectives and experiences of patients with chronic kidney disease.

Lucia New, Donna Goodridge, Joanne Kappel, Gary Groot, Roy Dobson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient and family activated escalation systems: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucia NewCollege of Medicine Health Sciences Program, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. lun620@usask.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3129-1811
Donna GoodridgeDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Room 543 Ellis Hall, 108 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
Joanne KappelDepartment of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Gary GrootDepartment of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Roy DobsonCollege of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

Canadian Patient Safety Institute NASaskatchewan Center for Patient Oriented Research NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrequent hospitalizations and dependency on technology and providers place individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at high risk for multiple safety events. Threats to their safety may be physical, emotional, or psychological. This study sought to explore patient safety from the perspectives and experiences of patients with CKD in acute care settings, and to describe willingness to report incidents utilizing an existing safety reporting system.

methodsThis study was conducted using a qualitative interpretive descriptive approach. Face to face interviews were conducted with 30 participants at their bedside during their current hospital admission. The majority of the participants were 50 years or older, of which 75% had a confirmed diagnosis of end stage renal disease with the remainder at stages 3 or 4 of CKD. Eighty percent of the participants were either on hemo- or peritoneal dialysis.

resultsParticipants expected to receive safe care, to be taken care of, and to be cared for. Safety threats included: sharing a room with patients who were on precautions; lack of cleanliness; and roommates perceived to be threatening. The concepts of being taken care of and being cared for constituted the safety threats identified within the interpersonal environment. Participants felt taken care of when their physical needs are met and cared for when their psychological and emotional needs are met. There was a general lack of awareness of the presence of a safety reporting system that was to be accessible to patients and families by telephone. There was also an overall unwillingness to report perceived safety incidents, although participants did distinguish between speaking up and reporting.

conclusionsA key finding was the unwillingness to report incidents using the safety reporting system. Fear of reprisals was the most significant reporting impediment expressed. Actively inviting patients to speak up may be more effective when combined with a psychologically safe environment in order to encourage the involvement of patients in patient safety. System-wide organizational changes may be necessary to mitigate emotional and physical harm for this client population.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPatient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultAgedAttitude to HealthEmotionsFearFemaleHospitalizationHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedRenal Insufficiency, ChronicTelephoneChronic kidney diseasePatient involvementQualitative researchSafetySafety incident reporting

Identifiers

PMID30922299
PMCPMC6437896
OpenAlexW2941004763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.