Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30922278›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

The association of mobility disability and obesity with risk of unemployment in two cohorts from Sweden.

Mattias Norrbäck, Per Tynelius, Gerd Ahlström, Finn Rasmussen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Labour market affiliation among non-bullied colleagues at work units with reported bullying.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mattias NorrbäckClinical Epidemiological Group, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per TyneliusClinical Epidemiological Group, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gerd AhlströmDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00, Lund, Sweden. gerd.ahlstrom@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6230-7583
Finn RasmussenDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEStockholm County Council · SE

Funding

Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap 2010-1828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with mobility disability (MD) or obesity often have more health problems and are less able to participate in work than individuals without these conditions. This study investigated whether people burdened with MD and obesity have a greater risk of unemployment than people with either one (MD only or obesity only) or none of these conditions.

methodsThe study included two Swedish population-based cohorts, a national cohort (n = 39,947) and a regional cohort (n = 40,088). Six exposure groups were created using baseline self-reported data on MD and body mass index from participants aged 19 to 64 years. The MD definition differed between the cohorts. Various sources of socio-demographic factors were used to address confounding. Participants' risks of unemployment were assessed longitudinally in a nationwide register with objective data and with almost no loss of follow-up (< 1%). Cox regression was used to analyse associations of MD and/or obesity (BMI ≥ 30) with risk of any (≥1 day) and long-term unemployment (≥90 days during two consecutive years). Quantile regression was used to estimate participants' unemployment risks as average days of unemployment. Normal-weight people without MD were used as a reference group. The Wald test was applied for specific group comparisons other than to the reference group.

resultsIn summary, the groups with MD and the obese group without MD had a higher risk of becoming unemployed than the reference group (regional survey adjusted hazard ratio range: 1.30-1.59; 95% CI range: 1.06-1.90, national survey adjusted hazard ratio range: 1.11-1.34; 95% CI range: 0.88-1.81). The obese group with MD did not differ from the groups with MD only or obesity only in terms of unemployment risk.

conclusionsPeople with MD and/or obesity are vulnerable groups at risk of prolonged unemployment during their working life in a country with a highly developed welfare system.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPersons with DisabilitiesRisk FactorsSwedenUnemploymentCohort studyDisabilityUnemploymentWeightWork participation

Identifiers

PMID30922278
PMCPMC6437925
OpenAlexW2937987366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.