Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30922254›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2019

Patient and provider experience and perspectives of a risk-based approach to multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease care: a mixed methods study.

Michelle D Smekal, Helen Tam-Tham, Juli Finlay, Maoliosa Donald, Chandra Thomas, Robert G Weaver, Robert R Quinn, Kin Tam, Braden J Manns, Marcello Tonelli and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Your Path to Transplant: A randomized controlled trial of a tailored expert system intervention to increase knowledge, attitudes, and pursuit of kidney transplant.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Effect of a Change in the Eligibility Criteria for Multidisciplinary Kidney Care.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Enhancing Clinical Decision Support in Nephrology: Addressing Algorithmic Bias Through Artificial Intelligence Governance.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Fulfillment and Validity of the Kidney Health Evaluation Measure for People with Diabetes.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2023
    Article
  13. Kidney medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. CKD Awareness Among US Adults by Future Risk of Kidney Failure.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle D SmekalDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Helen Tam-ThamDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Juli FinlayDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Maoliosa DonaldDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Chandra ThomasDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Robert G WeaverDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Robert R QuinnDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kin TamSouthern Alberta Renal Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Braden J MannsDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marcello TonelliDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Aminu BelloInterdisciplinary Chronic Disease Collaboration, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Navdeep TangriDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Brenda R HemmelgarnDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. brenda.hemmelgarn@ahs.ca.
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CASeven Oaks General Hospital · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) predicts risk of progression to kidney failure and is used to guide clinical decisions for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

methodsThe KFRE was implemented to guide access to multidisciplinary care for CKD patients in Alberta, Canada, based on their 2-year risk of kidney failure. We used a mixed methods approach to investigate patients' and providers' perspectives and experiences 1 year following KFRE implementation. We conducted post-implementation interviews with multidisciplinary clinic providers and with low-risk patients who transitioned from multidisciplinary to general nephrology care. We also administered pre- and post-implementation patient care experience surveys, targeting both low-risk patients discharged to general nephrology and high-risk patients who remained in the multidisciplinary clinic, and provider job satisfaction surveys.

resultsTwenty-seven interviews were conducted (9 patients, 1 family member, 17 providers). Five categories were identified among patients and providers: targeted care; access to resources outside the multidisciplinary clinics; self-efficacy; patient reassurance and reduced stress; and transition process for low-risk patients Two additional categories were identified among providers only: anticipated concerns and job satisfaction. Patients and providers reported that the risk-based approach allowed the clinic to target care to those most likely to experience kidney failure and most likely to benefit from multidisciplinary care. While some participants indicated the risk-based model enhanced the sustainability of the clinics, others expressed concern that care for low-risk patients discharged from multidisciplinary care, or those now considered ineligible, may be inadequate. Overall, 413 patients completed the care experience survey and 73 providers completed the workplace satisfaction survey. The majority of patients were satisfied with their care in both periods with no overall differences. When considering the responses "Always" and "Often" together versus not, there were statistically significant improvements in domains of access to care, caring staff, and safety of care. There were no differences in healthcare providers' job satisfaction following KFRE implementation.

conclusionsPatients and healthcare providers reported that the risk-based approach improved the focus of the multidisciplinary CKD clinics by targeting patients at highest risk, with survey results suggesting no difference in patient care experience or healthcare provider job satisfaction.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthKidney Failure, ChronicRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedAlbertaDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamPatient PreferenceQuality ImprovementRisk AdjustmentChronic kidney diseaseKidney failureKidney failure riskMixed methods researchNon-dialysis care

Identifiers

PMID30922254
PMCPMC6440153
OpenAlexW2929525991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.