Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30922229›Full record

ArticleBMC molecular biology2019

Development of a novel selection/counter-selection system for chromosomal gene integrations and deletions in lactic acid bacteria.

Winschau F Van Zyl, Leon M T Dicks, Shelly M Deane

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Expanding the genetic toolkit helps dissect a global stress response in the early-branching speciesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Recent Advances in Genetic Tools forFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Winschau F Van ZylDepartment of Microbiology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa.
Leon M T DicksDepartment of Microbiology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa. lmtd@sun.ac.za.
Shelly M DeaneDepartment of Microbiology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe underlying mechanisms by which probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) enhance the health of the consumer have not been fully elucidated. Verification of probiotic modes of action can be achieved by using single- or multiple-gene knockout analyses of bacterial mutants in in vitro or in vivo models. We developed a novel system based on an inducible toxin counter-selection system, allowing for rapid and efficient isolation of LAB integration or deletion mutants. The Lactococcus lactis nisin A inducible promoter was used for expression of the Escherichia coli mazF toxin gene as counter-selectable marker.

resultsThe flippase (FLP)/flippase recognition target (FRT) recombination system and an antisense RNA transcript were used to create markerless chromosomal gene integrations/deletions in LAB. Expression of NisR and NisK signalling proteins generated stable DNA integrations and deletions. Large sequences could be inserted or deleted in a series of steps, as demonstrated by insertion of the firefly bioluminescence gene and erythromycin resistance marker into the bacteriocin operons or adhesion genes of Lactobacillus plantarum 423 and Enterococcus mundtii ST4SA.

conclusionsThe system was useful in the construction of L. plantarum 423 and E. mundtii ST4SA bacteriocin and adhesion gene mutants. This provides the unique opportunity to study the role of specific probiotic LAB genes in complex environments using reverse genetics analysis. Although this work focuses on two probiotic LAB strains, L. plantarum 423 and E. mundtii ST4SA, the system developed could be adapted to most, if not all, LAB species.

Indexed as

INDEL MutationProbioticsSelection, GeneticDNA-Binding ProteinsEndoribonucleasesEnterococcusEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Knockout TechniquesHomologous RecombinationLactiplantibacillus plantarumNisinPromoter Regions, GeneticDNA-Binding ProteinsEndoribonucleasesEscherichia coli ProteinsMazF protein, E coliNisinnisin AAntibiotic marker recyclingCounter-selectionGene insertion/deletionHomologous recombinationMazF toxin

Identifiers

PMID30922229
PMCPMC6440147
OpenAlexW2942523222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.