Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30922215›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

A (fire)cloud-based DNA methylation data preprocessing and quality control platform.

Divy Kangeyan, Andrew Dunford, Sowmya Iyer, Chip Stewart, Megan Hanna, Gad Getz, Martin J Aryee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Research Progress of Single Cell Sequencing in Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. A Practical Guide to the Measurement and Analysis of DNA Methylation.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Divy KangeyanDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew DunfordBroad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sowmya IyerDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Chip StewartBroad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Megan HannaBroad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Gad GetzBroad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Martin J AryeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. aryee.martin@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6848-1344

Funding

Training Grant in Quantitative Sciences for Cancer ResearchT32CA009337 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN, TRIPPA, LORENZO · 1986 to 2025
$12.3M
Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard Merkin Institute FellowshipBroad Institute of MIT & Harvard SPARC GrantNational Cancer Institute Broad NCI Cloud Pilot ProjectNational Cancer Institute T32 CA 009337-37NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBisulfite sequencing allows base-pair resolution profiling of DNA methylation and has recently been adapted for use in single-cells. Analyzing these data, including making comparisons with existing data, remains challenging due to the scale of the data and differences in preprocessing methods between published datasets.

resultsWe present a set of preprocessing pipelines for bisulfite sequencing DNA methylation data that include a new R/Bioconductor package, scmeth, for a series of efficient QC analyses of large datasets. The pipelines go from raw data to CpG-level methylation estimates and can be run, with identical results, either on a single computer, in an HPC cluster or on Google Cloud Compute resources. These pipelines are designed to allow users to 1) ensure reproducibility of analyses, 2) achieve scalability to large whole genome datasets with 100 GB+ of raw data per sample and to single-cell datasets with thousands of cells, 3) enable integration and comparison between user-provided data and publicly available data, as all samples can be processed through the same pipeline, and 4) access to best-practice analysis pipelines. Pipelines are provided for whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and hybrid selection (capture) bisulfite sequencing (HSBS).

conclusionsThe workflows produce data quality metrics, visualization tracks, and aggregated output for further downstream analysis. Optional use of cloud computing resources facilitates analysis of large datasets, and integration with existing methylome profiles. The workflow design principles are applicable to other genomic data types.

Indexed as

Cloud ComputingDNA MethylationQuality ControlDatabases, Nucleic AcidGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareWhole Genome SequencingWorkflowBioinformatics workflowsCloud computingDNA methylationQuality control analysis

Identifiers

PMID30922215
PMCPMC6440105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.