Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30922116›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2019

Design and sample size considerations for Alzheimer's disease prevention trials using multistate models.

Ron Brookmeyer, Nada Abdalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enhancing early Alzheimer's disease clinical trials through prognostic score covariate adjustment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Research satisfaction among participants in a preclinical Alzheimer's disease trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Theoretical impact of the AT(N) framework on dementia using a community autopsy sample.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ron BrookmeyerDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nada AbdallaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Risks and Projections Using Multi-State Models with BiomarkersR21AG055361 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BROOKMEYER, RONALD S · 2017 to 2018
$424k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG055361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsClinical trials for Alzheimer's disease have been aimed primarily at persons who have cognitive symptoms at enrollment. However, researchers are now recognizing that the pathophysiological process of Alzheimer's disease begins years, if not decades, prior to the onset of clinical symptoms. Successful intervention may require intervening early in the disease process. Critical issues arise in designing clinical trials for primary and secondary prevention of Alzheimer's disease including determination of sample sizes and follow-up duration. We address a number of these issues through application of a unifying multistate model for the preclinical course of Alzheimer's disease. A multistate model allows us to specify at which points during the long disease process the intervention exerts its effects.

methodsWe used a nonhomogeneous Markov multistate model for the progression of Alzheimer's disease through preclinical disease states defined by biomarkers, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia. We used transition probabilities based on several published cohort studies. Sample size methods were developed that account for factors including the initial preclinical disease state of trial participants, the primary endpoint, age-dependent transition and mortality rates and specifications of which transition rates are the targets of the intervention.

resultsWe find that Alzheimer's disease prevention trials with a clinical primary endpoint of mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease dementia will require sample sizes of the order many thousands of individuals with at least 5 years of follow-up, which is larger than most Alzheimer's disease therapeutic trials conducted to date. The reasons for the large trial sizes include the long and variable preclinical period that spans decades, high rates of attrition among elderly populations due to mortality and losses to follow-up and potential selection effects, whereby healthier subjects enroll in prevention trials. A web application is available to perform sample size calculations using the methods reported here.

conclusionSample sizes based on multistate models can account for the points in the disease process when interventions exert their effects and may lead to more accurate sample size determinations. We will need innovative strategies to help design Alzheimer's disease prevention trials with feasible sample size requirements and durations of follow-up.

Indexed as

Sample SizeAge FactorsAlzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicCognitive DysfunctionDisease ProgressionEndpoint DeterminationHumansMarkov ChainsProbabilityTime FactorsBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseasemultistate modelsprevention trialssample size

Identifiers

PMID30922116
PMCPMC6442939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.