Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30921423›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Milk restriction or oligosaccharide supplementation in calves improves compensatory gain and digestive tract development without changing hormone levels.

Natália Alves Costa, Aline Priscila Pansani, Carlos Henrique de Castro, Diego Basile Colugnati, Carlos Henrique Xaxier, Katia Cylene Guimarães, Luiza Antas Rabelo, Valéria Nunes-Souza, Luis Fernando Souza Caixeta, Reginaldo Nassar Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natália Alves CostaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiania, Goiás, Brazil.
Aline Priscila PansaniDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiania, Goiás, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique de CastroDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiania, Goiás, Brazil.
Diego Basile ColugnatiDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiania, Goiás, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique XaxierDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiania, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4006-8213
Katia Cylene GuimarãesDepartment of Animal Science, Animal Nutrition Laboratory, Goiano Instituto Federal, Rio Verde, Goiás, Brazil.
Luiza Antas RabeloDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
Valéria Nunes-SouzaDepartment of Physiological and Pharmacology Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Luis Fernando Souza CaixetaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiania, Goiás, Brazil.
Reginaldo Nassar FerreiraDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiania, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0545-1439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimated the effect of oligosaccharide supplementation and feed restriction on calves. The study was divided into two experimental periods of 28 days each with 20 crossbred calves that had initial body weight of 37 Kg and housed in individual pens. The animals were split in four experimental groups: animals fed 6 L milk/day (CON) in the two periods, animals fed milk restricted (3 L milk/day) in the first period and followed by CON feeding in the second period (RES), animals receiving supplementation of 5 g/day of mannanoligosaccharide (MOS) and animals receiving supplementation of 5 g/day mannan and frutoligosaccharide (MFOS). At the end of the study, all the animals were slaughtered. The average weight gain was lower in the restricted group when compared with CON and MFOS groups in the first period (P < 0.05) and there were no difference among the groups in the second period. Animals supplemented with MOS showed a significant increases in jejunal villus height and rumen papillae, which were not observed for MFOS group (P < 0.05) compared with RES and CON groups. There were no difference in ghrelin and leptin levels among treatments during periods 1 and 2 (P > 0.05). Also, the expression of ghrelin receptors in the paraventricular region of the hypothalamus did not differ among groups. We conclude that milk restriction during the first weeks of life in calves resulted in compensatory gain and did not modify the hormonal profile and expression of the ghrelin receptor in the hypothalamus. Moreover, a prebiotic supplementation changed the development of intestinal and ruminal epithelium.

Indexed as

MilkAnimal FeedAnimalsBody WeightCattleDietary SupplementsEatingEpitheliumGastrointestinal TractGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHormonesHypothalamusOligosaccharidesReceptors, GhrelinHormonesOligosaccharidesReceptors, Ghrelin

Identifiers

PMID30921423
PMCPMC6438680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.