Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30921338›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Developing a community-based nursing and midwifery career pathway - A narrative systematic review.

Clare Harvey, Desley Hegney, Agnieszka Sobolewska, Diane Chamberlain, Elspeth Wood, Lisa Wirihana, Sandy Mclellan, Joyce Hendricks, Troy Wake

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Clare HarveySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Science, Central Queensland University, Townsville campus, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9016-8840
Desley HegneyResearch Division, Central Queensland University, Brisbane Campus, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1267-1760
Agnieszka SobolewskaResearch Division, Central Queensland University, Brisbane Campus, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Diane ChamberlainCollege of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Elspeth WoodSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Science, Central Queensland University, Townsville campus, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Lisa WirihanaSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Science, Central Queensland University, Noosa Campus, Noosa, Queensland, Australia.
Sandy MclellanSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Science, Central Queensland University, Mackay campus, Mackay, Queensland, Australia.
Joyce HendricksSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Science, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg Campus, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia.
Troy WakeMackay Health Service, Department of Health, Proserpine, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunity nursing and midwifery is changing in response to a shift in care from hospital to home, brought about by increasing costs to care because of an aging population and increasing chronicity. Until now, community nursing positions and scope of practice has been dependent on service focus and location, which has led to the role being unclearly defined. Lack of appeal for a career in community practice and a looming workforce shortage necessitates a review into how community nursing and midwifery transition to practice is supported.

methodsThis review sought to identify, assess and summarize available evidence relating to transitioning into community nursing and midwifery practice as a speciality. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach. A narrative synthesis was then undertaken on papers that examined community nursing and midwifery pathway perspectives which define, and enable or inhibit a contemporary pathway. Thematic analysis used a theoretical framework developed for early career and rapid transition to nursing specialty practice.

resultsThere is a paucity of research that identifies community nursing and midwifery as a discreet scope of practice. Twelve papers were eventually included in the review. Verbatim findings were extracted from the papers and clustered into categories based on the chosen theoretical framework. Major themes were 'the self' (professional and personal); 'transition processes'; and, a 'sense of belonging'. Sub themes included narrative identifying inhibitors and enablers in each theme. DISCUSSION: No definition of community practice or pathway was identified in nursing, although midwifery was clearly defined. Community nursing practice was described as generalist in nature although specialist knowledge is required. Being part of the community in the professional sense and personal sense was considered important. The importance of transition was identified where pre-entry exposure to community practice was seen as important. Stages in transition to practice were recognised as pre-entry; incomer; insider; and, a sense of belonging. The process of transition should be planned and individualised acknowledging past experience whilst acknowledging the specialist nature of community-based practice.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunity Health NursingCommunity MedicineHumansMidwiferyNarrationNurse's Role

Identifiers

PMID30921338
PMCPMC6438448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.