Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30921241›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2019

Effects of intraoperative propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative pain in spine surgery: Comparison with desflurane anesthesia - a randomised trial.

Wei-Lin Lin, Meei-Shyuan Lee, Chih-Shung Wong, Shun-Ming Chan, Hou-Chuan Lai, Zhi-Fu Wu, Chueng-He Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei-Lin LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center.
Meei-Shyuan LeeSchool of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center.
Chih-Shung WongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei.
Shun-Ming ChanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center.
Hou-Chuan LaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center.
Zhi-Fu WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center.
Chueng-He LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center.
Tri-Service General Hospital · TWNational Defense Medical Center · TWCathay General Hospital · TWNational Defense Medical College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs reported, patients experience less postoperative pain after propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). In the present study, we investigated the postoperative analgesic effects between propofol-based TIVA and desflurane anesthesia after spine surgery.

methodsSixty patients were included who received (surgical time >180 minutes) lumbar spine surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either TIVA (with target-controlled infusion) with propofol/fentanyl-based anesthesia (TIVA group) or desflurane/fentanyl-based anesthesia (DES group), titrated to maintain Bispectral Index values between 45 and 55. All patients received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl for postoperative pain relief. Numeric pain rating scale (NRS) pain scores, postoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative rescue tramadol use, and fentanyl-related side effects were recorded.

resultsThe TIVA group patients reported lower NRS pain scores during coughing on postoperative day 1 but not day 2 and 3 (P = .002, P = .133, P = .161, respectively). Less fentanyl consumption was observed on postoperative days 1 and 2, but not on day 3 (375 μg vs 485 μg, P = .032, 414 μg vs 572 μg, P = .033, and 421 μg vs 479 μg, P = .209, respectively), less cumulative fentanyl consumption at postoperative 48 hours (790 μg vs 1057 μg, P = .004) and 72 hours (1210 μg vs 1536 μg, P = .004), and total fentanyl consumption (1393 μg vs 1704 μg, P = .007) when compared with the DES group. No difference was found in rescue tramadol use and fentanyl-related side effects.

conclusionPatients anesthetized with propofol-based TIVA reported less pain during coughing and consumed less daily and total PCA fentanyl after lumbar spine surgery.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnesthesia, IntravenousAnesthetics, IntravenousDesfluraneFemaleFentanylHumansInfusions, SpinalIntraoperative CareLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainAnesthetics, IntravenousDesfluraneFentanylPropofol

Identifiers

PMID30921241
PMCPMC6456101
OpenAlexW2927224858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.