ArticleMedicine2019
Treatment for upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction in a patient with poststroke dysphagia: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuromuscular-related interventions for post-stroke dysphagia: a comprehensive narrative review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Retrograde Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Computed tomography in measuring electrode insertion angle and depth for cricopharyngeal muscle electromyography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- Effects of early rehabilitation nursing on neurological functions and quality of life of patients with ischemic stroke hemiplegia.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleBotulinum toxin injection is a widely used procedure for the treatment of the dysfunction of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Although the injection can be guided by ultrasound, electromyography, or computed tomography, such techniques cannot determine the exact extent of narrowed UES and ensure that the narrowed extent is fully covered by the treatment. This report describes a dual guiding technique with ultrasound and the balloon catheter in a patient with poststroke dysphagia to improve these weaknesses. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient was admitted to a rehabilitation hospital 2 weeks postcerebral infarction. DIAGNOSES: Clinical presentation of the patient included severe hemiplegia and dysphagia. The fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) revealed penetration/aspiration when swallowing 1 ml water and 1 ml yogurt and pooling in the postcricoid region.
interventionsBalloon catheter dilatation procedures and Botulinum toxin injection were performed. We used a dual guiding technique with ultrasound and the balloon catheter to determine the whole segment of UES dysfunction by locating the lowest level of the impaired UES opening and to reduce difficulty in differentiating UES from adjacent tissues during Botulinum toxin injection. OUTCOMES: No persistent progress was observed on the symptoms and volume of the balloon during dilatation. The patient showed quick responses after Botulinum toxin injection. The postinjection balloon catheter dilatation showed an increased maximum volume (preinjection, 5.5 ml vs. postinjection, 14 ml), and the patient was able to eat yogurt, congee, or semi-solid food 100-150 ml 4 weeks after the injection. LESSONS: The dual guiding method holds several advantages, suggesting that it may be considered as a promising choice in dealing with UES dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.