Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30921110›Full record

ArticleJournal of hypertension2019

Neurocognition in treatment-resistant hypertension: profile and associations with cardiovascular biomarkers.

Patrick J Smith, James A Blumenthal, Alan L Hinderliter, Stephanie M Mabe, Jeanne E Schwartz, Forgive Avorgbedor, Andrew Sherwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick J SmithDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham.
James A BlumenthalDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham.
Alan L HinderliterDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Stephanie M MabeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham.
Jeanne E SchwartzDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham.
Forgive AvorgbedorDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham.
Andrew SherwoodDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham.

Funding

Facility and Web-based Approaches to Lifestyle Change in Resistant HypertensionR01HL122836 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BLUMENTHAL, JAMES A, SHERWOOD, ANDREW · 2015 to 2019
$4.2M
Neurocognition, Lifestyle Modification, and Treatment Resistant HypertensionR01HL130237 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PATRICK JOSEY · 2016 to 2019
$1.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122836NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension in midlife has been associated with increased risk of stroke and neurocognitive decline. Few studies, however, have examined neurocognition among individuals with treatment-resistant hypertension or potential mechanisms by which treatment-resistant hypertension may impair neurocognition.

methodsWe examined the pattern of neurocognitive impairment and potential mechanisms in a sample of 96 overweight adults with treatment-resistant hypertension, aged 41-81 years. Neurocognitive function was assessed using a 45-min test battery consisting of executive function and memory. Vascular and metabolic mechanisms examined included cerebrovascular risk factors (CVRFs: Framingham Stroke Risk Profile), insulin sensitivity (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance), waist-to-hip ratio, microvascular function (hyperemic response), and peak oxygen consumption from an exercise treadmill test. Simple path analyses were used to assess the association between potential vascular and metabolic mechanisms and neurocognition.

resultsNeurocognitive impairments were common, with 70% of the sample exhibiting impaired performance on at least one executive function subtest and 38% on at least one measure of memory. Higher levels of aerobic fitness, greater insulin sensitivity, and better microvascular function, as well as lower CVRFs and waist-to-hip ratio were associated with better neurocognition. In path analyses, aerobic fitness, microvascular function, and CVRFs all were independently associated with neurocognitive performance. Insulin resistance associated with worse executive function but better memory performance among older participants.

conclusionNeurocognitive impairments are common in adults with treatment-resistant hypertension, particularly on tests of executive function. Better neurocognition is independently associated with aerobic fitness, microvascular function, and CVRFs.

Indexed as

CognitionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCoronary VasospasmExecutive FunctionExercise TestFemaleHumansHypertensionInsulin ResistanceMaleMemoryMicrovesselsMiddle AgedBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30921110
PMCPMC7279118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.