Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30920919›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2019

Device-Based Neuromodulation for Resistant Hypertension Therapy.

Thomas E Lohmeier, John E Hall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Resistant Hypertension: A Brief Review of Pathophysiology.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Device's design and clinical perspectives for resistant hypertension therapy.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024
    Review
  14. Brain Pathways in Blood Pressure Regulation.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Device-Based Therapy for Resistant Hypertension: An Up-to-Date Review.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas E LohmeierFrom the Department of Physiology and Biophysics (T.E.L., J.E.H.), University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.
John E HallFrom the Department of Physiology and Biophysics (T.E.L., J.E.H.), University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.

Funding

STRUCTURAL VASCULAR ADAPTATION OF THE MICROCIRCULATIONP01HL051971 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER · PI HALL, JOHN E · 1993 to 2018
$39.4M
Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115428 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI COMPRETTA, CAROLINE E. · 2016 to 2025
$38.2M
Role of obesity in preeclamptic pregnancy.P20GM121334 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI Babbette LaMarca, Jane F Reckelhoff · 2017 to 2026
$26.4M
The role of leptin in autoimmune-associated hypertensionP20GM104357 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI TAYLOR, ERIN BASSFORD · 2013 to 2022
$23.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL051971NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104357NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite availability of effective drugs for hypertension therapy, significant numbers of hypertensive patients fail to achieve recommended blood pressure levels on ≥3 antihypertensive drugs of different classes. These individuals have a high prevalence of adverse cardiovascular events and are defined as having resistant hypertension (RHT) although nonadherence to prescribed antihypertensive medications is common in patients with apparent RHT. Furthermore, apparent and true RHT often display increased sympathetic activity. Based on these findings, technology was developed to treat RHT by suppressing sympathetic activity with electrical stimulation of the carotid baroreflex and catheter-based renal denervation (RDN). Over the last 15 years, experimental and clinical studies have provided better understanding of the physiological mechanisms that account for blood pressure lowering with baroreflex activation and RDN and, in so doing, have provided insight into which patients in this heterogeneous hypertensive population are most likely to respond favorably to these device-based therapies. Experimental studies have also played a role in modifying device technology after early clinical trials failed to meet key endpoints for safety and efficacy. At the same time, these studies have exposed potential differences between baroreflex activation and RDN and common challenges that will likely impact antihypertensive treatment and clinical outcomes in patients with RHT. In this review, we emphasize physiological studies that provide mechanistic insights into blood pressure lowering with baroreflex activation and RDN in the context of progression of clinical studies, which are now at a critical point in determining their fate in RHT management.

Indexed as

BaroreflexBlood PressureDrug ResistanceImplantable NeurostimulatorsAnimalsAntihypertensive AgentsCatheter AblationElectric Stimulation TherapyEquipment DesignHumansHypertensionSympathectomySympathetic Nervous SystemTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agentsangiotensinbaroreceptorsblood pressureclinical trialkidneysympathetic nervous system

Identifiers

PMID30920919
PMCPMC6442942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.