Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30920766›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2019

A Machine Learning Classifier for Assigning Individual Patients With Systemic Sclerosis to Intrinsic Molecular Subsets.

Jennifer M Franks, Viktor Martyanov, Guoshuai Cai, Yue Wang, Zhenghui Li, Tammara A Wood, Michael L Whitfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Insights into Patient Heterogeneity in Sjögren's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer M FranksGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Hanover and Lebanon, New Hampshire.ORCID 0000-0003-2400-5431
Viktor MartyanovGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Guoshuai CaiArnold School of Public Health at University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Yue WangGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Zhenghui LiGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Tammara A WoodGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Michael L WhitfieldGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Hanover and Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Funding

Translational studies for identifying and targeting novel pathways in systemic sclerosis pathogenesisP50AR060780 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LAFYATIS, ROBERT A. · 2011 to 2021
$14.9M
Quantitative Biomedical Sciences at DartmouthT32LM012204 · NLM · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TOSTESON, TOR D · 2016 to 2020
$876k
Burroughs Wellcome Big Data in the Life Sciences Training ProgramDr. Ralph and Marian Falk Medical Research TrustNIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR060780NLM NIH HHS T32 LM012204Scleroderma Research FoundationWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHigh-throughput gene expression profiling of tissue samples from patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) has identified 4 "intrinsic" gene expression subsets: inflammatory, fibroproliferative, normal-like, and limited. Prior methods required agglomerative clustering of many samples. In order to classify individual patients in clinical trials or for diagnostic purposes, supervised methods that can assign single samples to molecular subsets are required. We undertook this study to introduce a novel machine learning classifier as a robust accurate intrinsic subset predictor.

methodsThree independent gene expression cohorts were curated and merged to create a data set covering 297 skin biopsy samples from 102 unique patients and controls, which was used to train a machine learning algorithm. We performed external validation using 3 independent SSc cohorts, including a gene expression data set generated by an independent laboratory on a different microarray platform. In total, 413 skin biopsy samples from 213 individuals were analyzed in the training and testing cohorts.

resultsRepeated cross-fold validation identified consistent and discriminative markers using multinomial elastic net, performing with an average classification accuracy of 87.1% with high sensitivity and specificity. In external validation, the classifier achieved an average accuracy of 85.4%. Reanalyzing data from a previous study, we identified subsets of patients that represent the canonical inflammatory, fibroproliferative, and normal-like subsets.

conclusionWe developed a highly accurate classifier for SSc molecular subsets for individual patient samples. The method can be used in SSc clinical trials to identify an intrinsic subset on individual samples. Our method provides a robust data-driven approach to aid clinical decision-making and interpretation of heterogeneous molecular information in SSc patients.

Indexed as

Supervised Machine LearningTranscriptomeAdultAgedAlgorithmsDatasets as TopicFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedScleroderma, SystemicYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30920766
PMCPMC6764877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.