Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30920682›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2019

Divergence in gut microbial communities mirrors a social group fission event in a black-and-white colobus monkey (Colobus vellerosus).

Claire K Goodfellow, Tabor Whitney, Diana M Christie, Pascale Sicotte, Eva C Wikberg, Nelson Ting

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gut microbial community in proboscis monkeys (Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  7. Ecology and evolution of the social microbiome.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Claire K GoodfellowInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
Tabor WhitneyDepartment of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
Diana M ChristieInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
Pascale SicotteDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Eva C WikbergDepartment of Anthropology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Nelson TingInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-0765-8177
University of Oregon · USBest High Pressure & Drilling Technology (Austria) · ATUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Research Area IIIP50GM098911 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PARTHASARATHY, RAGHUVEER · 2012 to 2016
$9.8M
Alberta IngenuityAmerican Society of PrimatologistsInternational Primatological SocietyLeakey FoundationMETA Center for Systems BiologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM098911Province of AlbertaSweden-America FoundationUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of OregonUniversity of Oregon's O'Day Fellowship Program in Biological Sciences and Office of the Vice President for Research and InnovationWenner-Gren Foundation 8172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host behavior and social factors have increasingly been implicated in structuring the composition of gut microbial communities. In social animals, distinct microbial communities characterize different social groups across a variety of taxa, although little longitudinal research has been conducted that demonstrates how this divergence occurs. Our study addresses this question by characterizing the gut microbial composition of an African Old World monkey, the black-and-white colobus (Colobus vellerosus), before and after a social group fission event. Gut microbial taxonomic composition of these monkeys was profiled using the V-4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene, and pairwise-relatedness values were calculated for all individuals using 17 short tandem repeat loci and partial pedigree information. The two social groups in this study were found to harbor distinct microbial signatures after the fission event from which they emerged, while these communities were not divergent in the same individuals before this event. Three genera were found to differ in abundance between the two new social groups: Parabacteroides, Coprococcus, and Porphyromonadaceae. Additionally, although this fission happened partially along lines of relatedness, relatedness did not structure the differences that we found. Taken together, this study suggests that distinct gut microbial profiles can emerge in social groups in <1 year and recommends further work into more finely mapping the timescales, causes, and potentially adaptive effects of this recurring trend toward distinct group microbial signatures.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAnimalsBehavior, AnimalColobusFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGhanaHoming BehaviorRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16Sgroup fissiongut microbiomesocial groupssociality

Identifiers

PMID30920682
PMCPMC6765454
OpenAlexW2949341864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.