Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30920291›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2019

Beyond the myths about work addiction: Toward a consensus on definition and trajectories for future studies on problematic overworking.

Paweł A Atroszko, Zsolt Demetrovics, Mark D Griffiths

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Work addiction and personality: A meta-analytic study.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Workaholism and the Enactment of Bullying Behavior at Work: A Prospective Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advancing Workaholism Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Paweł A AtroszkoDepartment of Psychometrics and Statistics, Institute of Psychology,University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk,Poland.
Zsolt DemetrovicsDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Addiction, Institute of Psychology,ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest,Hungary.
Mark D GriffithsPsychology Department,Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham,UK.
Eötvös Loránd University · HUNottingham Trent University · GBUniversity of Gdańsk · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an unprecedented collaborative effort to integrate the existing knowledge on work addiction and delineate trajectories for future studies, several papers from work addiction researchers (including some of the most prolific experts in the field) have contributed to the debate on the misconceptions/myths about this problematic behavior. On the basis of the overview of the presented arguments, the most commonly proposed recommendations were that there should be: (a) a general definition of work addiction, (b) the need for more transdisciplinary and integrative approach to research, and (c) propositions regarding more high-quality research. These three aspects are summarized in the present paper. There is a general agreement among work addiction researchers that work addiction is a problematic behavior that merits more systematic studies, which require input and expertise from a wide range of fields due to its complex nature.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveConsensusHumansbehavioral addictionproblematic overworkingproblematic workwork addictionworkaholism

Identifiers

PMID30920291
PMCPMC7044606
OpenAlexW2934997900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.