Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30920119›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2019

Multimodal porogen platforms for calcium phosphate cement degradation.

Irene Lodoso-Torrecilla, Eline-Claire Grosfeld, Abe Marra, Brandon T Smith, Antonios G Mikos, Dietmar Jo Ulrich, John A Jansen, Jeroen Jjp van den Beucken

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multimodal porogen platforms for calcium phosphate cement degradation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Irene Lodoso-TorrecillaDepartment of Regenerative Biomaterials, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eline-Claire GrosfeldDepartment of Regenerative Biomaterials, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abe MarraDepartment of Regenerative Biomaterials, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Brandon T SmithDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77030.
Antonios G MikosDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77030.
Dietmar Jo UlrichDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
John A JansenDepartment of Regenerative Biomaterials, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen Jjp van den BeuckenDepartment of Regenerative Biomaterials, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences · NLRice University · USRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Rapidly-Degrading Calcium Phosphate Cements for Orthopedic Tissue Engineering.F30AR071258 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, BRANDON · 2017 to 2020
$168k
Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine W81XWH-14-2-0004Life Science & Health, Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs BONE-IP2NIAMS NIH HHS F30 AR071258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) represent excellent bone substitute materials due to their biocompatibility and injectability. However, their poor degradability and lack of macroporosity limits bone regeneration. The addition of poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) particles improves macroporosity and therefore late stage material degradation. CPC degradation and hence, bone formation at an early stage remains challenging, due to the delayed onset of PLGA degradation (i.e., after 2-3 weeks). Consequently, we here explored multimodal porogen platforms based on sucrose porogens (for early pore formation) and PLGA porogens (for late pore formation) to enhance CPC degradation and analyzed mechanical properties, dynamic in vitro degradation and in vivo performance in a rat femoral bone defect model. Porogen addition to CPC showed to decrease compressive strength of all CPC formulations; transition of the crystal phase upon in vitro incubation increased compressive strength. Although dynamic in vitro degradation showed rapid sucrose dissolution within 1 week, no additional effects on CPC degradation or bone formation were observed upon in vivo implantation. © 2019 The Authors. journal Of Biomedical Materials Research Part A Published By Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 1713-1722, 2019.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone CementsCalcium PhosphatesMaleOsteogenesisPorosityProsthesis ImplantationRats, WistarBone Cementscalcium phosphateCalcium Phosphatescalcium phosphate cementdegradationPLGAporositysucrose

Identifiers

PMID30920119
PMCPMC6618311
OpenAlexW2929373958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.