Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30920002›Full record

ReviewMass spectrometry reviews2019

MS1 ion current-based quantitative proteomics: A promising solution for reliable analysis of large biological cohorts.

Xue Wang, Shichen Shen, Sailee Suryakant Rasam, Jun Qu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mass spectrometry reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. MS1Connect: a mass spectrometry run similarity measure.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Deep Learning Based MS2 Feature Detection for Data-Independent Shotgun Proteomics.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Analysis of the Barley Malt Rootlet Proteome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xue WangDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Shichen ShenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, New York, New York.
Sailee Suryakant RasamDepartment of Biochemistry, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, New York, New York.
Jun QuDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly-advancing field of pharmaceutical and clinical research calls for systematic, molecular-level characterization of complex biological systems. To this end, quantitative proteomics represents a powerful tool but an optimal solution for reliable large-cohort proteomics analysis, as frequently involved in pharmaceutical/clinical investigations, is urgently needed. Large-cohort analysis remains challenging owing to the deteriorating quantitative quality and snowballing missing data and false-positive discovery of altered proteins when sample size increases. MS1 ion current-based methods, which have become an important class of label-free quantification techniques during the past decade, show considerable potential to achieve reproducible protein measurements in large cohorts with high quantitative accuracy/precision. Nonetheless, in order to fully unleash this potential, several critical prerequisites should be met. Here we provide an overview of the rationale of MS1-based strategies and then important considerations for experimental and data processing techniques, with the emphasis on (i) efficient and reproducible sample preparation and LC separation; (ii) sensitive, selective and high-resolution MS detection; iii)accurate chromatographic alignment; (iv) sensitive and selective generation of quantitative features; and (v) optimal post-feature-generation data quality control. Prominent technical developments in these aspects are discussed. Finally, we reviewed applications of MS1-based strategy in disease mechanism studies, biomarker discovery, and pharmaceutical investigations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersChromatography, LiquidCohort StudiesDrug DiscoveryHumansMass SpectrometryProteomeProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersProteomeion current-based proteomicslarge cohortsLC-MSMS1 quantificationreproducible protein measurement

Identifiers

PMID30920002
PMCPMC6849792
OpenAlexW2932867787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.