ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2019
Commentary: Broadening the scope of educational neuroscience, reflections on Thomas, Ansari, and Knowland (2019).
Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fit to Study: Reflections on designing and implementing a large-scale randomized controlled trial in secondary schools.Trends in neuroscience and education · 2020Review
- Cognitive Research and Mathematics Education-How Can Basic Research Reach the Classroom?Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Educational neuroscience is more than the basic science of reading and math, and its translational potential extends far beyond the knowledge, and misconceptions, that have made their way into the classroom so far. Thomas, Ansari, and Knowland synthesize progress in educational neuroscience and set out an ambitious set of goals for its future. Their conceptualization of the field encourages scientists across disciplines to think about how their work can inform a more holistic understanding of how the brain shapes learning, and how learning shapes the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30919478What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.