Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30919303›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2019

Tracheostomy After Severe Acute Brain Injury: Trends and Variability in the USA.

Vijay Krishnamoorthy, Catherine L Hough, Monica S Vavilala, Jordan Komisarow, Nophanan Chaikittisilpa, Abhijit V Lele, Karthik Raghunathan, Claire J Creutzfeldt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Practical approach to respiratory emergencies in neurological diseases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vijay KrishnamoorthyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC, 27710, USA. vijay.krishnamoorthy@duke.edu.
Catherine L HoughDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Monica S VavilalaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Jordan KomisarowDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Nophanan ChaikittisilpaHarborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Abhijit V LeleDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Karthik RaghunathanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Claire J CreutzfeldtDepartment of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Duke University · USUniversity of Washington · USHarborview Injury Prevention and Research Center · USSeattle University · US

Funding

Navigating Patients and Families through the Neuro-ICUK23NS099421 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CREUTZFELDT, CLAIRE JOHANNA · 2017 to 2021
$951k
NIH HHS K23 NS099421NIH HHS L30 NS084420NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS099421NINDS NIH HHS L30 NS084420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveSevere acute brain injury (SABI) is responsible for 12 million deaths annually, prolonged disability in survivors, and substantial resource utilization. Little guidance exists regarding indication or optimal timing of tracheostomy after SABI. Our aims were to determine national trends in tracheostomy utilization among mechanically ventilated patients with SABI in the USA, as well as to examine factors associated with tracheostomy utilization following SABI.

methodsWe conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2011. We identified adult patients with SABI, defined as a primary diagnosis of stroke, traumatic brain injury or post-cardiac arrest who received mechanical ventilation for greater than 96 h. We analyzed trends in tracheostomy utilization over time and used multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression to analyze factors associated with tracheostomy utilization.

resultsThere were 94,082 hospitalizations for SABI during the study period, with 30,455 (32%) resulting in tracheostomy utilization. The proportion of patients with SABI who received a tracheostomy increased during the study period, from 28.0% in 2002 to 32.1% in 2011 (p < 0.001). Variation in tracheostomy utilization was noted based on patient and facility characteristics, including higher odds of tracheostomy in large hospitals (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.53, p < 0.001, compared to small hospitals), teaching hospitals (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.25, p = 0.001, compared to non-teaching hospitals), and urban hospitals (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.33-1.92, p < 0.001, compared to rural hospitals).

conclusionsTracheostomy utilization has increased in the USA among patients with SABI, with wide variation by patient and facility-level factors.

Indexed as

Procedures and Techniques UtilizationTracheostomyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticFemaleHeart ArrestHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory InsufficiencyRetrospective StudiesStrokeBrain injuryRespiratory failureTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID30919303
PMCPMC6582655
OpenAlexW2925109958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.