Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30919257›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2019

Efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimen versus cisplatin-based regimen in the treatment of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Gongchen Wang, Binfeng Yang, Zhaoyuan Fu, Xin Wang, Zhiming Zhang

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Efficacy and safety of FLOT regimenResearch in pharmaceutical sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathogenesis and anti-proliferation mechanisms of Crocin in human gastric carcinoma cells.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gongchen WangAffiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, 732 West Jiayuguan Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
Binfeng YangAffiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, 732 West Jiayuguan Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
Zhaoyuan FuAffiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, 732 West Jiayuguan Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
Xin WangAffiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, 732 West Jiayuguan Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
Zhiming ZhangAffiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, 732 West Jiayuguan Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China. zhangzhimingys@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-9913
Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCisplatin played an important role in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). Oxaliplatin has been shown to be at least as effective as cisplatin for GC, with less toxicity and a better tolerability profile. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimen versus cisplatin-based regimen in the treatment of GC.

methodsDatabases of CNKI, CBM, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library were searched for eligible literatures from their establishments to November 2018. Randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimen with that of cisplatin-based regimen in the treatment of GC were included. Statistical analyses were calculated using RevMan 5.3 software.

resultsSeven randomized controlled trials including 2297 patients were included. Compared with cisplatin-based regimen intervention in GC, oxaliplatin-based regimen treatment was able to significantly improve the partial response rate (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.49; p = 0.007), disease progression rate (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.25-0.66; p = 0.0002) and 1-year survival (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.00-1.56; p = 0.05). The toxicities of hematopoietic system were significantly higher in cisplatin-based regimen group (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.46-0.79; p = 0.0002), while oxaliplatin-based regimen group had higher neurosensory toxicity (OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.52-3.21; p < 0.0001), In addition, gastrointestinal toxicity was similar between the two groups (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.5-2.01; p = 0.27).

conclusionsCompared with cisplatin-based regimen, oxaliplatin-based regimen treatment has an obvious advantage in patients with GC with acceptable tolerance.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinHumansOxaliplatinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSafetyStomach NeoplasmsCisplatinOxaliplatinChemotherapyCisplatinGastric cancerOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID30919257
OpenAlexW2922753816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.