Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30919181›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO

Lamini Dauda, Xingle Long, Claudia Nyarko Mensah, Muhammad Salman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Does the pollution halo hypothesis exist in this "better" world? The evidence from STIRPAT model.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  7. The pain of breathing: how does haze pollution affect urban innovation?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  8. The asymmetric effect of technology shocks on CO2 emissions: a panel analysis of BRICS economies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of globalization, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption on COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Towards Achieving Sustainable Development: Role of Technology Innovation, Technology Adoption and COInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lamini DaudaSchool of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China. dabremp@gmail.com.
Xingle LongSchool of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Claudia Nyarko MensahSchool of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Muhammad SalmanSchool of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2017M610051, 2018T110054National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos. 71603105Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province SBK2016042936Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China 16YJC790067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economic growth and economic energy consumption have received greater attention due to its contribution to global CO

Indexed as

AsiaCarbon DioxideCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesEconomic DevelopmentEnvironmental PollutionEuropeGreenhouse GasesGross Domestic ProductInventionsLeast-Squares AnalysisMiddle EastUrbanizationCarbon DioxideGreenhouse GasesCO2 emissionsEconomic growthInnovation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.