Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30919126›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2019

Physiological comparison between non-athletes, endurance, power and team athletes.

Hans Degens, Arvydas Stasiulis, Albertas Skurvydas, Birute Statkeviciene, Tomas Venckunas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Hans DegensSchool of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Arvydas StasiulisInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Albertas SkurvydasInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Birute StatkevicieneInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Tomas VenckunasInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania. tomas.venckunas@lsu.lt.
Lithuanian Sports University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We hypothesized that endurance athletes have lower muscle power than power athletes due to a combination of weaker and slower muscles, while their higher endurance is attributable to better oxygen extraction, reflecting a higher muscle oxidative capacity and larger stroke volume. Endurance (n = 87; distance runners, road cyclists, paddlers, skiers), power (n = 77; sprinters, throwers, combat sport athletes, body builders), team (n = 64; basketball, soccer, volleyball) and non-athletes (n = 223) performed a countermovement jump and an incremental running test to estimate their maximal anaerobic and aerobic power (VO

Indexed as

AthletesCardiorespiratory FitnessPhysical EnduranceAdolescentAdultHumansMaleMuscle ContractionSportsAnaerobic capacityJumping powerMaximal oxygen uptakePerformance

Identifiers

PMID30919126
OpenAlexW2932029327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.