Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30919113›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2019

Do people with arthritis differ from healthy controls in their internal comparison standards for self-reports of health, fatigue, and pain?

Doerte U Junghaenel, Stefan Schneider, Arthur A Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Doerte U JunghaenelUSC Dornsife Center for Self-Report Science, & Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Verna & Peter Dauterive Hall, 635 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-3332, USA. junghaen@usc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7733-571X
Stefan SchneiderUSC Dornsife Center for Self-Report Science, & Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Verna & Peter Dauterive Hall, 635 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-3332, USA.
Arthur A StoneUSC Dornsife Center for Self-Report Science, & Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Verna & Peter Dauterive Hall, 635 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-3332, USA.

Funding

Frame of Reference Effects in Health Disparities ResearchR01AG042407 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STONE, ARTHUR A · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
National Institute on Aging R01 AG042407NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatient-reported outcomes are central for the assessment and treatment of people with chronic disease. The primary aim of this study was to determine if people with arthritis differed from healthy individuals in their use of internal comparison standards when answering questions about their health and symptomatology. A secondary aim was to determine if average levels of the patient-reported outcomes were associated with the use of internal comparison standards, regardless of whether a participant had arthritis or no chronic medical condition.

methodsPeople with a self-report diagnosis of any type of arthritis (n = 588) and healthy controls (n = 567) were recruited from an Internet panel and were randomly assigned to rate two of three outcomes: health, fatigue, and pain. After completing their rating, participants were presented with internal comparison standards and indicated which ones, if any, they used for the ratings they provided. The internal comparison standards were: Interpersonal (comparisons with other people); Historical (comparisons with the past); Imaginary comparisons (comparisons with a hypothetical scenario); or that none of the three were used.

resultsAfter controlling for group differences in demographic characteristics and outcome levels by including them in the analyses as covariates, people with arthritis were more likely to make Historical comparisons than healthy controls when rating their health. No other group differences in the use of internal comparison standards were found. We further found that the use of internal comparison standards was associated with health and symptom levels, regardless of whether a participant had arthritis or no medical condition. Poorer self-rated health, greater fatigue, and higher pain were associated with a greater likelihood of making a Historical comparison. Furthermore, poorer self-rated health was associated with a greater likelihood of making an Interpersonal comparison, and higher fatigue and pain with a greater likelihood of making an Imaginary comparison.

conclusionPeople with arthritis differed in their use of Historical comparison standards compared to those with no chronic medical condition for health ratings. In addition, poorer health and more severe symptomatology were associated with the use of internal comparison standards in both groups of participants, people with arthritis and healthy controls.

Identifiers

PMID30919113
PMCPMC6437229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.