Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30919093›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019

Role of biochar and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to enhance soil carbon sequestration-a review.

Rubab Sarfraz, Azhar Hussain, Asma Sabir, Ibtissem Ben Fekih, Allah Ditta, Shihe Xing

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Insights into conventional and recent technologies for arsenic bioremediation: A systematic review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Analyses of Antioxidative Response in Tomato (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rubab SarfrazFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil Environmental Health and Regulation, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China. rubabsarfraz@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2868-4083
Azhar HussainDepartment of Soil Science, University College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Asma SabirInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ibtissem Ben FekihInstitute of Environmental Microbiology, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Allah DittaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Sheringal, Dir (U), Sheringal, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 18000, Pakistan.
Shihe XingFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil Environmental Health and Regulation, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global climate is undergoing significant changes due to extensive release of greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as CO

Indexed as

Carbon SequestrationCharcoalClimate ChangeGreenhouse GasesPlant DevelopmentAtmosphereCarbonCarbon DioxideEnvironmental MonitoringGasesMethanePlantsRhizobiaceaeSoilbiocharCarbonCarbon DioxideCharcoalGasesGreenhouse GasesMethaneSoilCarbon stockClimate changeCO2 emissionGreenhouse gasesSOC

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.