Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30919085›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019

Central Nervous System Involvement of Natural Killer and T Cell Neoplasms.

Ashley E Aaroe, Kathryn S Nevel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Primary peripheral T-cell central nervous system lymphoma.Surgical neurology international · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley E AaroeDepartment of Neurology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 528 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Kathryn S NevelDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, 355 W. 16th St., Ste 3200, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. knevel@iupui.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPeripheral natural killer (NK) and T cell neoplasms comprise approximately 10-15% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. There are 27 different subtypes of peripheral NK and T cell neoplasms, each of which is relatively uncommon. Treatment has been largely extrapolated from case series, retrospective reports, and paradigms developed for the aggressive B cell lymphomas. This review explores the current knowledge of the characteristics, outcome, and treatment of CNS T cell and NK neoplasms. RECENT

findingsPrimary and secondary CNS NK and T cell malignancies confer significant morbidity and poor prognosis. Despite clinical heterogeneity between the 27 subtypes, high-dose methotrexate-based regimens seem most effective overall. The role of prophylaxis against secondary CNS involvement remains controversial. Autologous stem cell transplant and immunotherapy are potential for promising future therapies. Current understanding of incidence, outcome, and optimal treatment strategies for CNS T cell and NK neoplasms is limited, in large part due to their diversity and rarity. Prognosis is poor, except in a few reports of long-term survival in patients most often treated with combination therapy including high-dose methotrexate. A future prospective study on treatment and outcome in CNS T cell and NK neoplasms is needed to better define these diseases.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyHumansKiller Cells, NaturalLeukemia, T-CellLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMethotrexatePrognosisT-LymphocytesMethotrexateBrain metastasisCentral nervous system diseasesCNSLeptomeningeal carcinomatosisT cell leukemiaT cell lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID30919085
OpenAlexW2924261868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.