ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019
Central Nervous System Involvement of Natural Killer and T Cell Neoplasms.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aggressive Natural Killer Cell Leukemia in an Adolescent Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Recent Progress on Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma-From Bench to Bedside.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Primary peripheral T-cell central nervous system lymphoma.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
- Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection progresses to aggressive NK cell leukemia with a poor prognosis.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPeripheral natural killer (NK) and T cell neoplasms comprise approximately 10-15% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. There are 27 different subtypes of peripheral NK and T cell neoplasms, each of which is relatively uncommon. Treatment has been largely extrapolated from case series, retrospective reports, and paradigms developed for the aggressive B cell lymphomas. This review explores the current knowledge of the characteristics, outcome, and treatment of CNS T cell and NK neoplasms. RECENT
findingsPrimary and secondary CNS NK and T cell malignancies confer significant morbidity and poor prognosis. Despite clinical heterogeneity between the 27 subtypes, high-dose methotrexate-based regimens seem most effective overall. The role of prophylaxis against secondary CNS involvement remains controversial. Autologous stem cell transplant and immunotherapy are potential for promising future therapies. Current understanding of incidence, outcome, and optimal treatment strategies for CNS T cell and NK neoplasms is limited, in large part due to their diversity and rarity. Prognosis is poor, except in a few reports of long-term survival in patients most often treated with combination therapy including high-dose methotrexate. A future prospective study on treatment and outcome in CNS T cell and NK neoplasms is needed to better define these diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.