Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30919076›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019

Proton radiotherapy in advanced malignant melanoma of the conjunctiva.

Simone L Scholz, Joel Hérault, Andreas Stang, Klaus G Griewank, Daniel Meller, Juliette Thariat, Klaus-Peter Steuhl, Henrike Westekemper, Wolfgang Sauerwein

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Simone L ScholzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. Simone.Scholz@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-3790
Joel HéraultCentre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.
Andreas StangCenter of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Klaus G GriewankDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Daniel MellerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Juliette ThariatCentre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.
Klaus-Peter SteuhlDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Henrike WestekemperDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Wolfgang SauerweinDepartment of Radiation Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Essen University Hospital · DECentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRBoston University · USJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of conjunctival melanoma is challenging and frequently ends in exenteration. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term results of proton beam radiation with regard to various clinical parameters.

methodsEighty-nine patients with extended conjunctival melanoma (≥T2) and multifocal bulbar located tumors (T1c/d) were treated consecutively with proton radiotherapy (dose 45 Gy). The following parameters were assessed: TNM stage, tumor origin, local recurrence, performance of exenteration, occurrence of metastases, overall survival, and potential complications. A time-to-event analysis was preformed to the primary endpoints: relapse, metastasis, exenteration, and death by use of Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression that provides hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

resultsThe median follow-up time was 4.2 years (max. 21.7 years). Local recurrence and metastatic disease occurred in 33% and 16% of patients, respectively. Exenteration-free survival and overall survival tended to be worse in T3 melanoma. No association between tumor origin and local recurrence, metastatic disease, or overall survival was observed. Main complications after proton radiotherapy were sicca-syndrome (30%), secondary glaucoma (11%), and limbal stem cell deficiency (8%).

conclusionsIn summary, proton radiotherapy in conjunctival melanoma is an effective alternative to exenteration, with a 5-year cumulative probability of eye preservation of 69%.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overConjunctivaConjunctival NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProton TherapyRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsConjunctivaExenterationMalignant melanomaMetastasisProton radiotherapyRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID30919076
OpenAlexW2925240874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.