Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30919050›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2019

Mouse models for microphthalmia, anophthalmia and cataracts.

Jochen Graw

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Systematic review:Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Porcn is essential for growth and invagination of the mammalian optic cup.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  16. Biallelic Deletion ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jochen GrawInstitute of Developmental Genetics, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. graw@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0298-9660
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse mutants are a long-lasting, valuable tool to identify genes underlying eye diseases, because the absence of eyes, very small eyes and severely affected, cataractous eyes are easily to detect without major technical equipment. In mice, actually 145 genes or loci are known for anophthalmia, 269 for microphthalmia, and 180 for cataracts. Approximately, 25% of the loci are not yet characterized; however, some of the ancient lines are extinct and not available for future research. The phenotypes of the mutants represent a continuous spectrum either in anophthalmia and microphthalmia, or in microphthalmia and cataracts. On the other side, mouse models are still missing for some genes, which have been identified in human families to be causative for anophthalmia, microphthalmia, or cataracts. Finally, the mouse offers the possibility to genetically test the roles of modifiers and the role of SNPs; these aspects open new avenues for ophthalmogenetics in the mouse.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophthalmosCataractEyeHumansMiceMicrophthalmosMutationPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID30919050
PMCPMC6710221
OpenAlexW2923456236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.