Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30918982›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2019

[Nonbeneficial care-a burden for clinicians and relatives].

D Schwarzkopf

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

D SchwarzkopfKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland. daniel.schwarzkopf@med.uni-jena.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthically demanding decisions in intensive care as well as the perception of nonbeneficial care can be a burden for clinicians and patients' relatives.

objectivesAn overview of prevalence, causes, and consequences of perceived nonbeneficial care and possible interventions is provided. MATERIALS AND

methodsNarrative review. RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe perception of nonbeneficial care is a subjective moral judgement. Almost every ICU clinician regularly perceives nonbeneficial care. There is clear evidence that perceived nonbeneficial care is associated with burnout of clinicians and intention to leave the job. For relatives being involved in end-of-life decisions is of particular burden. Clinicians often state that relatives' whishes are the reason for nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatment. A good ethical climate as well as good nurse-physician collaboration are associated with less perception of nonbeneficial care and shorter time to therapy limitations. Structured communication to plan therapy involving relatives might reduce nonbeneficial care and together with supporting interventions reduce staff burnout. Improving communication by consultants in charge has been shown to reduce the burden of relatives. In future, co-treating surgeons must be more strongly involved in interventions.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalBurnout, PsychologicalCritical CareMedical OveruseCommunicationDecision MakingHumansIntensive Care UnitsTerminal CareEthical issuesInterdisciplinary health teamMedical careOccupational burnoutProfessional-family relations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.