Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30918920›Full record

ReviewJBMR plus2019

Multiple Myeloma and Fatty Acid Metabolism.

Majdi Masarwi, Abigail DeSchiffart, Justin Ham, Michaela R Reagan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JBMR plus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Lipid metabolic vulnerabilities of multiple myeloma.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Metabolic Disorders in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Majdi MasarwiCenter for Molecular Medicine Maine Medical Center Research Institute Scarborough ME USA.
Abigail DeSchiffartCenter for Molecular Medicine Maine Medical Center Research Institute Scarborough ME USA.
Justin HamCenter for Molecular Medicine Maine Medical Center Research Institute Scarborough ME USA.
Michaela R ReaganCenter for Molecular Medicine Maine Medical Center Research Institute Scarborough ME USA.

Funding

Understanding Factors Influencing COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination in Immigrant Low-income and Homeless Populations and Testing Targeted InterventionsU54GM115516 · NIGMS · MAINEHEALTH · PI CLIFFORD JAMES ROSEN · 2017 to 2026
$51.6M
The role of night shift work in metabolic disorders during and after pregnancyP20GM121301 · NIGMS · MAINEHEALTH · PI CLIFFORD JAMES ROSEN · 2017 to 2026
$25.1M
Progenitor Cell Analysis CoreP30GM106391 · NIGMS · MAINEHEALTH · PI WOJCHOWSKI, DON MICHAEL · 2013 to 2017
$5.7M
Skeletal Phenotyping CoreP30AR066261 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KRONENBERG, HENRY M. · 2014 to 2018
$3.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR066261NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121301NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM106391NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for 13% to 15% of all blood cancers1 and is characterized by the proliferation of malignant cells within the bone marrow (BM). Despite important advances in treatment, most patients become refractory and relapse with the disease. As MM tumors grow in the BM, they disrupt hematopoiesis, create monoclonal protein spikes in the blood, initiate systemic organ and immune system shutdown,2 and induce painful osteolytic lesions caused by overactive osteoclasts and inhibited osteoblasts.3, 4 MM cells are also extremely dependent on the BM niche, and targeting the BM niche has been clinically transformative for inhibiting the positive-feedback "vicious cycle" between MM cells and osteoclasts that leads to bone resorption and tumor proliferation.5, 6, 7, 8 Bone marrow adipocytes (BMAs) are dynamic, secretory cells that have complex effects on osteoblasts and tumor cells, but their role in modifying the MM cell phenotype is relatively unexplored.9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Given their active endocrine function, capacity for direct cell-cell communication, correlation with aging and obesity (both MM risk factors), potential roles in bone disease, and physical proximity to MM cells, it appears that BMAs support MM cells.14, 15, 16, 17 This supposition is based on research from many laboratories, including our own. Therapeutically targeting the BMA may prove to be equally transformative in the clinic if the pathways through which BMAs affect MM cells can be determined. In this review, we discuss the potential for BMAs to provide free fatty acids to myeloma cells to support their growth and evolution. We highlight certain proteins in MM cells responsible for fatty acid uptake and oxidation and discuss the potential for therapeutically targeting fatty acid metabolism or BMAs from where they may be derived. © 2019 The Authors.

Indexed as

BONE MARROW ADIPOSEBONE MARROW MICROENVIRONMENTCARNITINE PALMITOYLTRANSFERASE ICPT1ETOMOXIRFATTY ACID UPTAKE AND OXIDATIONMULTIPLE MYELOMA

Identifiers

PMID30918920
PMCPMC6419611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.