Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30918689›Full record

ArticleNursing open2019

Reconfiguring clinical communication in the electronic counselling context: The nuances of disruption.

Bjørg Oftedal, Beate-Christin Hope Kolltveit, Marit Graue, Vibeke Zoffmann, Bjørg Karlsen, Sally Thorne, Margareth Kristoffersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bjørg OftedalFaculty of Health Sciences University of Stavanger Stavanger Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6320-8509
Beate-Christin Hope KolltveitFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Centre for Evidence-Based Practice Western Norway University of Applied Sciences Bergen Norway.
Marit GraueFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Centre for Evidence-Based Practice Western Norway University of Applied Sciences Bergen Norway.
Vibeke ZoffmannThe Research Unit Women's and Children's Health The Juliane Marie Centre University Hospital Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Bjørg KarlsenFaculty of Health Sciences University of Stavanger Stavanger Norway.
Sally ThorneSchool of Nursing University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada.
Margareth KristoffersenFaculty of Health Sciences University of Stavanger Stavanger Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0800-1169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study expands on an earlier study about diabetes nurses' experiences of the Guided Self-Determination intervention in face-to-face consultations among people with type 2 diabetes. This current study investigates Guided Self-Determination in an electronic format with the aim to explore what can be learned about the written form for health communication from the perspectives of diabetes nurses in primary care.

designThe study has an explorative, qualitative design.

methodFour diabetes nurses were individually interviewed after completing the electronic intervention. The analysis was guided by Interpretive Description.

resultsSmall sample size apart, the rich empirical data and quality of dialogue point to the interviewees' earlier contact, comfort and trust with the researcher. The written electronic communication could disrupt nurses' possibilities for using basic and advanced communication skills. Findings also indicate that written electronic communication can foster thoughtful responses to patients and increase possibilities for a transparent counselling delivery process.

Identifiers

PMID30918689
PMCPMC6419105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.