ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2018
[Indications and results of surgical resection of bubbles arising from pulmonary emphysema].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical resection of bubbles or bullectomy is the gold standard in the treatment of bubbles arising from pulmonary emphysema. It is usually indicated for patients with complicated bubbles or when they are the underlying cause of disabling dyspnea. This study aims to determine the indications for bullectomy and to evaluate surgical outcomes in our Department. We conducted a retrospective, descriptive study of 24 patients (23 men and 1 woman) whose average age was 49 years and who had undergone bullectomy between 2004 and 2013. Collected data were: factors favoring the occurrence of bullous emphysema, the circumstances in which bubble was detected, data from the radiological examinations, data from pulmonary and cardiovascular function testing, data from bullectomy, data from postoperative clinical and functional examination. Morbidity rate was 37.5 %. The main complication was persistent air leak (7 cases). One patient died two days after surgery due to acute respiratory failure. The average follow-up period was 26 months during which we observed improvement of dyspnea in all patients and no complications. Bullectomy is an effective, reliable and safe surgical technique that may improve patients' quality of life for a few years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.