Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30918531›Full record

ArticlePatient safety in surgery2019

Adherence to the WHO surgical safety checklist: an observational study in a Swiss academic center.

René Schwendimann, Catherine Blatter, Marc Lüthy, Giulia Mohr, Thierry Girard, Siegfried Batzer, Erica Davis, Henry Hoffmann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05798000 (Effect of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and Anaesthesia Equipment Checklist on Patients Outcomes in Low-resource Settings.), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05798000 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and Anaesthesia Equipment Checklist on Patients Outcomes in Low-resource Settings.

TypeobservationalSponsorBogomolets National Medical UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled2,200ConditionsSafety Issues
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Systematic recording and discussion of intraoperative adverse events using ClassIntra: results of a qualitative context analysis before implementation.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fostering Excellence in Obstetrical Surgery.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2023
    Review
  18. A quality improvement initiative using peer audit and feedback to improve compliance.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

René Schwendimann1Patient Safety Office, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 22, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4804-1656
Catherine Blatter2Department Public Health DPH, Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel; Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Marc Lüthy3Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Giulia Mohr1Patient Safety Office, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 22, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Thierry Girard3Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Siegfried Batzer3Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Erica Davis1Patient Safety Office, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 22, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Henry Hoffmann4Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is used globally to ensure patient safety during surgery. Two years after its implementation in the University Hospital Basel's operating rooms, adherence to the protocol was evaluated.

methodsThis mixed method observational study took place in the surgical department of the University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland from April to August 2017. Data collection was via individual structured interviews with selected OR team members regarding checklist adherence and on-site non-participant observations of Team Time Out and Team Sign Out sequences in the OR. Data were subjected to thematic analysis and descriptive statistics compiled.

resultsComprehensive local expert interviews indicated that individual, procedural and contextual variables influenced the application of the checklist. Facilitating factors included well-informed specialists who advocated the use of the Checklist, as well as teams focused on the checklist's intended process and on its content. In contrast, factors such as staff insecurity, a generally negative attitude towards the checklist, a lack of teamwork, and hesitance to complete the checklist, hindered its implementation.The checklist's application was evaluated in 104 on-site observations comprising of 72 Team Time Out (TTO) and 32 Team Sign Out (TSO) sections. Adherence to the protocol ranged between 96 and 100% in TTO and 22% in TSO respectively. Lack of implementation of the TSO was mainly due to the absence of one of the key OR team members, who were busy with other tasks or no longer present in the operating room.

conclusionThe study illustrates factors, which foster and hinder consistent application of the WHO surgical safety checklist namely individual, procedural and contextual. It also demonstrates that the TTO was consistently and correctly applied, while the unavailability of key OR team members at sign-out time was the most common reason for omission or incomplete use of the TSO.

Indexed as

AdherenceShort reportSurgical checklistTeam sign outTeam time out

Identifiers

PMID30918531
PMCPMC6419440
OpenAlexW2938714877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.