ArticlePatient safety in surgery2019
Adherence to the WHO surgical safety checklist: an observational study in a Swiss academic center.
Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05798000 (Effect of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and Anaesthesia Equipment Checklist on Patients Outcomes in Low-resource Settings.), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and Anaesthesia Equipment Checklist on Patients Outcomes in Low-resource Settings.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adherence to the WHO surgical safety checklist at Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia: a prospective observational study.BMC surgery · 2026Observational
- Root causes of surgical never-events: a systematic review.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
- Knowledge and attitudes towards the WHO surgical safety checklist among healthcare workers in Mogadishu, Somalia.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Does the Surgical Safety Checklist need a co-pilot? Comparing adherence in gynecological surgery through electronic medical records and OR Black Box video observations.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Observational
- Surgical team perceptions of the surgical safety checklist implementation in Indonesian hospitals: a descriptive qualitative study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Protocol for implementation of intraoperative adverse event recording during WHO checklist sign-out.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Systematic recording and discussion of intraoperative adverse events using ClassIntra: results of a qualitative context analysis before implementation.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025Article
- The association between surgical complications and compliance to the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: A retrospective analysis of hospital records.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Enhancing Surgical Safety: Evaluating Compliance With the WHO Checklist in a Peripheral Hospital in Sri Lanka.Cureus · 2025Article
- Implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist in resource-limited Somalia: a new standard in surgical safety.Patient safety in surgery · 2024Article
- Enhancing Surgical Outcomes: Evaluating the Impact of Implementing the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist-A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Post-Anesthesia Recovery: A Comprehensive Review of Sampe, Modified Aldrete, and White Scoring Systems.Cureus · 2024Review
- Improving surgical safety checklist utilisation at 23 public health facilities in Ethiopia: a collaborative quality improvement project.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Make a difference: implementation, quality and effectiveness of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
- The Nursing Practice Environment and Patients' Satisfaction with Nursing Care in a Hospital Context.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and Anesthesia Equipment Checklist efficacy in war-affected low-resource settings: a prospective two-arm multicenter study.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2023Article
- Fostering Excellence in Obstetrical Surgery.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2023Review
- A quality improvement initiative using peer audit and feedback to improve compliance.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2022Article
- Compliance with the World Health Organization's surgical safety checklist and related postoperative outcomes: a nationwide survey among 172 health facilities in Ethiopia.Patient safety in surgery · 2022Article
- Compliance with the surgical safety checklist in Switzerland: an observational multicenter study based on self-reported data.Patient safety in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is used globally to ensure patient safety during surgery. Two years after its implementation in the University Hospital Basel's operating rooms, adherence to the protocol was evaluated.
methodsThis mixed method observational study took place in the surgical department of the University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland from April to August 2017. Data collection was via individual structured interviews with selected OR team members regarding checklist adherence and on-site non-participant observations of Team Time Out and Team Sign Out sequences in the OR. Data were subjected to thematic analysis and descriptive statistics compiled.
resultsComprehensive local expert interviews indicated that individual, procedural and contextual variables influenced the application of the checklist. Facilitating factors included well-informed specialists who advocated the use of the Checklist, as well as teams focused on the checklist's intended process and on its content. In contrast, factors such as staff insecurity, a generally negative attitude towards the checklist, a lack of teamwork, and hesitance to complete the checklist, hindered its implementation.The checklist's application was evaluated in 104 on-site observations comprising of 72 Team Time Out (TTO) and 32 Team Sign Out (TSO) sections. Adherence to the protocol ranged between 96 and 100% in TTO and 22% in TSO respectively. Lack of implementation of the TSO was mainly due to the absence of one of the key OR team members, who were busy with other tasks or no longer present in the operating room.
conclusionThe study illustrates factors, which foster and hinder consistent application of the WHO surgical safety checklist namely individual, procedural and contextual. It also demonstrates that the TTO was consistently and correctly applied, while the unavailability of key OR team members at sign-out time was the most common reason for omission or incomplete use of the TSO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.