Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30918332›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2019

Preliminary psychometric analyses of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set.

Peter Wayne New, Denise G Tate, Martin B Forchheimer, Julia Maria D'Andréa Greve, Divya Parashar, Marcel W M Post

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reciprocal association between pain and quality of life after newly acquired spinal cord injury.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Longitudinal measurement invariance of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set (SCI-QoL-BDS) during spinal cord injury/disorder inpatient rehabilitation.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter Wayne NewSpinal Rehabilitation Service, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. p.new@alfred.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5669-3286
Denise G TateProfessor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Martin B ForchheimerSenior Research Associate, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Julia Maria D'Andréa GreveAssociated Professor, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Divya ParasharHead of Department, Rehabilitation Psychology, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi, India.
Marcel W M PostCenter of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center, Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSecondary psychometric analysis of cross-sectional previously collected data.

objectivesExplore the floor and ceiling effects, convergent, and divergent validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Basic Quality of Life Data Set (SCI QoL-BDS) in a sample of people with spinal cord damage (SCD) from different countries, with different causes (both traumatic and non-traumatic), and different settings.

settingCommunity dwellers with SCD in Australia, Brazil, India, The Netherlands, and USA, and inpatient rehabilitation: India.

methodsAdults (>18 years) with chronic SCD with either traumatic or non-traumatic aetiologies living in the community (n = 624), in inpatient rehabilitation following the onset of SCI (India; n = 115) and able-bodied controls (Australia; n = 220) had the following data collected by survey or face-face interview: SCI QoL-BDS, demographic and clinical characteristics (e.g., age, gender, years post SCI/SCD, education, employment) and reference measures of quality of life, disability and depression.

resultsFor the whole sample, there were no notable floor or ceiling effects, internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84) and the corrected item-total correlations generally were acceptable (all > 0.3 except for in Brazilian cohort). Convergent and divergent validity were largely confirmed though there were some aspects of validity that were suboptimal.

conclusionsOnly minor psychometric issues were identified. This preliminary analysis suggests that there are no reason for concern about the use of the SCI QoL-BDS for clinical or research purposes, notwithstanding the need for further studies.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualInternationalityPsychometricsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSpinal Cord InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.