Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30918268›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Improving eDNA yield and inhibitor reduction through increased water volumes and multi-filter isolation techniques.

Margaret E Hunter, Jason A Ferrante, Gaia Meigs-Friend, Amelia Ulmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Integrating molecular methods and biophysical modeling to assess functional connectivity between marine protected areas.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Methodological considerations for aqueous environmental RNA collection, preservation, and extraction.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Margaret E HunterU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, 7920 North West 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida, 32653, USA. mhunter@usgs.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-9302
Jason A FerranteCherokee Nation Technologies, contracted to the U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, 7920 North West 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida, 32653, USA.
Gaia Meigs-FriendU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, 7920 North West 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida, 32653, USA.
Amelia UlmerU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, 7920 North West 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida, 32653, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To inform management and conservation decisions, environmental DNA (eDNA) methods are used to detect genetic material shed into the water by imperiled and invasive species. Methodological enhancements are needed to reduce filter clogging, PCR inhibition, and false-negative detections when eDNA is at low concentrations. In the first of three simple experiments, we sought to ameliorate filter clogging from particulates and organic material through a scaled-up, multi-filter protocol. We combined four filters in a 5 mL Phenol-Chloroform-Isoamyl (PCI) procedure to allow for larger volumes of water (~1 L) to be filtered rapidly. Increasing the filtered water volume by four times resulted in 4.4X the yield of target DNA. Next, inhibition from organic material can reduce or block eDNA detections in PCR-based assays. To remove inhibitory compounds retained during eDNA isolation, we tested three methods to chemically strip inhibitors from eDNA molecules. The use of CTAB as a short-term (5-8 day) storage buffer, followed by a PCI isolation, resulted in the highest eDNA yields. Finally, as opposed to a linear relationship among increasing concentrations of filtered genomic eDNA, we observed a sharp change between the lower (70-280 ng) and higher (420-560 ng) amounts. This may be important for effectively precipitating eDNA during protocol testing.

Indexed as

EcosystemDNA, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringPolymerase Chain ReactionWaterDNA, EnvironmentalWater

Identifiers

PMID30918268
PMCPMC6437164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.