Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917983›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2019

Results from a Prospective

Frieder Fuchs, Axel Hamprecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The mecillinam resistome inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Pivmecillinam.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Activity of mecillinam against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  8. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frieder FuchsInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Axel HamprechtInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany axel.hamprecht@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1449-5780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activity of mecillinam (amdinocillin) was assessed in

Indexed as

AgedAmdinocillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsFemaleHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesProteus mirabilisAmdinocillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-lactamase OXA-48, E colibeta-LactamasesEscherichia coli ProteinsEnterobacteriaceaeESBLmecillinammultidrug resistanceOXA-48pivmecillinamurinary tract infectionUTI

Identifiers

PMID30917983
PMCPMC6437539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.