Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917977›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2019

G Tetz, M Collins, D Vikina, V Tetz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Unveiling the mechanisms of synthetic compounds againstCurrent research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  3. Vaccine Strategies for Cryptococcus neoformans.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Recent Antifungal Pipeline Developments againstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G TetzTGV-Therapeutics, New York, New York, USA georgetets@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3205-9018
M CollinsPulmonary Biology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
D VikinaHuman Microbiology Institute, New York, New York, USA.
V TetzHuman Microbiology Institute, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9047-6763
CDG Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An urgent need exists for new antifungal compounds to treat fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. The aim of the current study was to investigate the potency of a novel antifungal compound, MYC-053, against the emerging yeast and yeast-like pathogens

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBiofilmsCandidaCandida glabrataCryptococcus neoformansDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Resistance, FungalMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPneumocystisPyrimidinesAntifungal AgentsPyrimidinesantifungal resistantCandida glabrataPneumocystis

Identifiers

PMID30917977
PMCPMC6437499
OpenAlexW2953124494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.