Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917874›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2019

Trends in maternal and neonatal mortality in South Africa: a systematic review.

Damian J Damian, Bernard Njau, Ester Lisasi, Sia E Msuya, Andrew Boulle

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Great saves or near misses? Severe maternal outcome in Metro East, South Africa: A region-wide population-based case-control study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Damian J DamianSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. dmndam001@myuct.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-2359-8768
Bernard NjauSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ester LisasiSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sia E MsuyaInstitute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Andrew BoulleSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Sociobehavioral Sciences Research to Improve Care for HIV Infection in TanzaniaD43TW009595 · FIC · KILIMANJARO CHRISTIAN MEDICAL CENTRE · PI Blandina Theophil Mmbaga · 2013 to 2026
$4.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasuring and monitoring progress towards Millennium Development Goals (MDG) 4 and 5 required valid and reliable estimates of maternal and child mortality. In South Africa, there are conflicting reports on the estimates of maternal and neonatal mortality, derived from both direct and indirect estimation techniques. This study aimed to systematically review the estimates made of maternal and neonatal mortality in the period from 1990 to 2015 in South Africa and determine trends over this period.

methodsNationally-representative studies reporting on maternal and neonatal mortality in South Africa were included for synthesis. Literature search for eligible studies was conducted in five electronic databases: Medline, Africa-Wide Information, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL. Searches were restricted to articles written in English and presenting data covering the period between 1990 and 2015. Reference lists of retrieved articles were screened for additional publications, and grey literature was searched for relevant documents for the review. Three independent reviewers were involved in study selection, data extractions and achieving consensus.

resultsIn total, 969 studies were retrieved and 670 screened for eligibility yielding 25 studies reporting data on maternal mortality and 14 studies on neonatal mortality. Most of the studies had a low risk of bias. Estimates from the institutional reporting differed from the international metrics with wide uncertainty/confidence intervals. Moreover, modelled estimates were widely divergent from estimates obtained through empirical methods. In the last two decades, both maternal and neonatal mortality appear to have increased up to 2009, followed by a decrease, more pronounced in the care of maternal mortality.

conclusionEstimates from both global metrics and institutional reporting, although widely divergent, indicate South Africa has not achieved MDG 4a and 5a goals but made a significant progress in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. To obtain more accurate estimates, there is a need for applying additional estimation techniques which utilise available multiple data sources to correct for underreporting of these outcomes, perhaps the capture-recapture method. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016042769.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityMaternal MortalityFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornSouth AfricaMaternal mortalityMillennium Development GoalsNeonatal mortalitySouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID30917874
PMCPMC6436230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.