Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917819›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2019

Healthy working time arrangements for healthcare personnel and patients: a systematic literature review.

Vilde H Bernstrøm, Daniele Evelin Alves, Dag Ellingsen, Mari Holm Ingelsrud

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Postoperative Complications Associated with Moderate Sedation in Endoscopic Procedures Among Patients with Cirrhosis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vilde H BernstrømOsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Work Research Institute, P.O.Box 4 St. Olavs Plass, N-0130 OSLO, Oslo, Norway.
Daniele Evelin AlvesOsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Work Research Institute, P.O.Box 4 St. Olavs Plass, N-0130 OSLO, Oslo, Norway. daniele.alves@oslomet.no.
Dag EllingsenOsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Work Research Institute, P.O.Box 4 St. Olavs Plass, N-0130 OSLO, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3089-2065
Mari Holm IngelsrudOsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Work Research Institute, P.O.Box 4 St. Olavs Plass, N-0130 OSLO, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of working time arrangements have been linked to negative consequences for both health personnel and their patients. A common hypothesis put forth to explain these findings suggests that certain working time arrangements lead to negative patient consequences due to the adverse impact they have on employee health. The purpose of this study is to use systematic reviews to investigate whether employee health explains the relationship between working time arrangements and patient safety.

methodsA systematic literature review was performed including published reviews and original studies from MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cinahl and Web of Science investigating working time arrangements for healthcare personnel, employee health and patient safety. In addition, we screened reference lists of identified reviews. Two reviewers independently identified relevant publications according to inclusion criteria, extracted findings and assessed quality.

resultsSix thousand nine hundred thirty papers were identified, of which 52 studies met our criteria. Articles were categorized into five groups according to how they approached the research question: 1) independent analyses of relationship between working time arrangements and employee health, and of working time arrangements and patient safety (5 studies); 2) relationship between working time arrangements on both employee health and patient safety (21 studies); 3) working time arrangements and employee health as two explanatory variables for patient safety (8 studies); 4) combinations of the above analyses (7 studies); 5) other relevant studies (5 studies). Studies that find that working time is detrimental to employee health, generally also find detrimental results for patient safety. This is particularly shown through increases in errors by health personnel. When controlling for employee health, the relationship between working time arrangements and patient safety is reduced, but still significant.

conclusionsResults suggest that employee health partially (but not completely) mediates the relationship between working time arrangements and patient safety. However, there is a lack of studies directly investigating employee health as a mediator between working time arrangements and patient safety. Future studies should address this research gap.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelOccupational HealthPatient SafetyWork Schedule ToleranceDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMedical ErrorsPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingTime FactorsHealthHealth sectorPatient safetyShift workSystematic reviewWorking time

Identifiers

PMID30917819
PMCPMC6437911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.