Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917795›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

A cross-sectional study of enteric fever among febrile patients at Ambo hospital: prevalence, risk factors, comparison of Widal test and stool culture and antimicrobials susceptibility pattern of isolates.

Tolera Deksissa, Endrias Zewdu Gebremedhin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk Factors for Typhoid Fever: Systematic Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Epidemiology of Multidrug-ResistantJournal of tropical medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Co-existence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases blaEuropean journal of medical research · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prevalence ofNew microbes and new infections · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tolera DeksissaDepartment of Laboratories, West Shewa Health Bureau, Ambo Hospital, P.O. Box 03, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Endrias Zewdu GebremedhinDepartment of Veterinary Laboratory Technology, Ambo University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, P.O. Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia. endrias.zewdu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9432-6532
Ambo University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteric fever is one of the common infectious diseases of humans. The objectives of this study were to:1) estimate the prevalence of enteric fever among febrile patients visiting Ambo hospital; 2) comparison of Widal test and stool culture;3) evaluation of the antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates; and 4) assess potential risk factors to acquire enteric fever infection.

methodsBlood and stool samples were collected from 372 febrile patients with symptoms clinically similar to enteric fever. Widal test was used for testing sera while stool culturing and bacterial identification was done using WHO standard methods. Susceptibility testing was done using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Chi-Square test and Logistic Regression analysis were used to analyze the data.

resultsThe apparent and true prevalence of enteric fever were 56.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.97-61.29%) and 57.52% (95% CI: 52.3-62.6%) respectively, while, the culture prevalence was 2.7% (95% CI: 1.30-4.89%). Isolation rates of S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi were 0.8% (95% CI: 0.17-2.34%) and 1.9% (95% CI: 0.76-3.84%) respectively. The isolates showed 100% resistance to amoxicillin, bacitracin, erythromycin, 80%resistance to cefotaxime and streptomycin and 20% for chloramphenicol. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of Widal test was 80.0, 44.5, 3.8 and 98.8% respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.45; 95% CI: 1.38-4.37; P = 0.002), religion (aOR = 15.57, 95% CI: 3.01-80.64; P = 0.001), level of education (aOR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.27-5.28; P = 0.009), source of water (aOR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.21-3.98; P = 0.009), raw milk (aOR =2.19, 95% CI:1.16-4.16; P = 0.016) and raw meat consumption (aOR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.07-3.01; P = 0.026) are the predictors of enteric fever seropositivity.

conclusionsPatients were wrongly diagnosed and treated for enteric fever by Widal test. Therefore, rapid tests with better sensitivity and specificity are needed for the diagnosis of enteric fever. Provision of safe water and health education are vital to bring behavioral change towards raw food consumption.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Infective AgentsChildCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEthiopiaFecesFemaleHospitalsHumansImmunologic TestsMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial susceptibilityCultureEnteric feverRisk factors and prevalenceWidal test

Identifiers

PMID30917795
PMCPMC6437987
OpenAlexW2940941087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.