Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917791›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2019

Impact of primary colorectal Cancer location on the KRAS status and its prognostic value.

Ming-Zhi Xie, Ji-Lin Li, Zheng-Min Cai, Ke-Zhi Li, Bang-Li Hu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Distinct Driver Pathway Enrichments and a High Prevalence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Impact of KRAS mutation on the tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer.International journal of biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. KRAS: A Druggable Target in Colon Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ming-Zhi XieDepartment of Research, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 71 Hedi Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
Ji-Lin LiDepartment of Research, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 71 Hedi Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
Zheng-Min CaiDepartment of Research, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 71 Hedi Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
Ke-Zhi LiDepartment of Research, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 71 Hedi Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
Bang-Li HuDepartment of Research, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 71 Hedi Road, Nanning, 530021, China. hubangli@gxmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4401-0601
Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81260315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) originating from the right-sided or left-sided colon is distinct clinicopathological entity. The KRAS status and its prognostic value in CRC remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association of KRAS status with clinicopathological features and prognostic value in CRC.

methods178 colon cancer and 145 rectal cancer patients were enrolled. KRAS mutation test was performed on paraffin-embedded tumor samples using PCR methods. The colon cancer was divided into right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC). Studies that reported the association of KRAS mutation with CRC clinical features and prognosis in databases were searched prior to 2018. The data of the present study was combined with the data of published studies using meta-analysis methods.

resultsNo significant difference between colon cancer and rectal cancer regarding the KRAS status. The KRAS mutation was much frequent in RCC than in LCC (p = 0.010). 17 studies with 11,385 colon cancer patients were selected, the pooled results of our data and previous published data showed that KRAS mutation was more frequent in RCC compared with in LCC (p < 0.01); KRAS mutation was not associated with the prognosis in RCC patient; however, KRAS mutation indicated a poor prognosis in LCC patients compared with KRAS wild type (p < 0.01).

conclusionKRAS status has no difference between colon cancer and rectal cancer. KRAS mutation was more frequent in RCC than in LCC, and associated with a poor prognosis in LCC patients, but not in RCC patients.

Indexed as

MutationAgedBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Colorectal cancerKRAS mutationPrognosisTumor location

Identifiers

PMID30917791
PMCPMC6437985
OpenAlexW2939215161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.