Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917588›Full record

ArticleToxins2019

Evidence for Naturally Produced Beauvericins Containing

Monika Urbaniak, Łukasz Stępień, Silvio Uhlig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Sequencing of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Molluscicidal Screening ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Phytotoxic Metabolites Produce byFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Toxins · 2020
    Review
  8. Induction ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  9. Divergence of Beauvericin Synthase Gene amongJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Cyclodepsipeptide Biosynthesis inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  11. Toxins · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika UrbaniakPlant-Pathogen Interaction Team, Department of Pathogen Genetics and Plant Resistance, Institute of Plant Genetics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479 Poznań, Poland. murb@igr.poznan.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-1735-4556
Łukasz StępieńPlant-Pathogen Interaction Team, Department of Pathogen Genetics and Plant Resistance, Institute of Plant Genetics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479 Poznań, Poland. lste@igr.poznan.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-9740-9520
Silvio UhligNorwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo, Norway. silvio.uhlig@vetinst.no.ORCID 0000-0001-6419-9563
Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLNorwegian Veterinary Institute · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beauvericin is a depsipeptide mycotoxin. The production of several beauvericin analogues has previously been shown among various genera among

Indexed as

DepsipeptidesFusariumHypocrealesMethyltyrosinesMycotoxinsOryzabeauvericinDepsipeptidesMethyltyrosinesMycotoxinsbeauvenniatinbeauvericindepsipeptideFusariumIsariamycotoxinPaecilomyces

Identifiers

PMID30917588
PMCPMC6468924
OpenAlexW2930141121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.