Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917561›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2019

Assessment of the Effectiveness of a Computerised Decision-Support Tool for Health Professionals for the Prevention and Treatment of Childhood Obesity. Results from a Randomised Controlled Trial.

George Moschonis, Maria Michalopoulou, Konstantina Tsoutsoulopoulou, Elpis Vlachopapadopoulou, Stefanos Michalacos, Evangelia Charmandari, George P Chrousos, Yannis Manios

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

George MoschonisDepartment of Dietetics, Nutrition and Sport, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia. g.moschonis@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3009-6675
Maria MichalopoulouDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens, 70 El Venizelou Avenue, Kallithea, 17671 Athens, Greece. mariamichal95@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1450-6646
Konstantina TsoutsoulopoulouDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens, 70 El Venizelou Avenue, Kallithea, 17671 Athens, Greece. kontsou@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0019-5533
Elpis VlachopapadopoulouDepartment of Endocrinology-Growth and Development, Children's Hospital P. A. Kyriakou, 11527 Athens, Greece. elpis.vl@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5641-7081
Stefanos MichalacosDepartment of Endocrinology-Growth and Development, Children's Hospital P. A. Kyriakou, 11527 Athens, Greece. stmichalakos@gmail.com.
Evangelia CharmandariDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, First Department of Pediatrics, University of Athens Medical School, Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece. echarmand@med.uoa.gr.
George P ChrousosDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, First Department of Pediatrics, University of Athens Medical School, Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece. chrousge@med.uoa.gr.
Yannis ManiosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens, 70 El Venizelou Avenue, Kallithea, 17671 Athens, Greece. manios@hua.gr.
Harokopio University of Athens · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRPanagiotis & Aglaia Kyriakou Children's Hospital · GRLa Trobe University · AU

Funding

State Scholarships Foundation 2016-050-0503-7624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the effectiveness of a computerised decision-support tool (DST), designed for paediatric healthcare professionals, as a means to tackle childhood obesity. A randomised controlled trial was conducted with 65 families of 6⁻12-year old overweight or obese children. Paediatricians, paediatric endocrinologists and a dietitian in two children's hospitals implemented the intervention. The intervention group (IG) received personalised meal plans and lifestyle optimisation recommendations via the DST, while families in the control group (CG) received general recommendations. After three months of intervention, the IG had a significant change in dietary fibre and sucrose intake by 4.1 and -4.6 g/day, respectively. In addition, the IG significantly reduced consumption of sweets (i.e., chocolates and cakes) and salty snacks (i.e., potato chips) by -0.1 and -0.3 portions/day, respectively. Furthermore, the CG had a significant increase of body weight and waist circumference by 1.4 kg and 2.1 cm, respectively, while Body Mass Index (BMI) decreased only in the IG by -0.4 kg/m². However, the aforementioned findings did not differ significantly between study groups. In conclusion, these findings indicate the dynamics of the DST in supporting paediatric healthcare professionals to improve the effectiveness of care in modifying obesity-related behaviours. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesSoftwareAlgorithmsChildFemaleHumansMaleMealsPediatric ObesityRisk FactorsWeight Reduction Programschildrenhealthcare professionalsinterventionnutritionobesitypersonalised

Identifiers

PMID30917561
PMCPMC6471646
OpenAlexW2922687910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.