Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917528›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Deep Learning for Validating and Estimating Resolution of Cryo-Electron Microscopy Density Maps

Todor Kirilov Avramov, Dan Vyenielo, Josue Gomez-Blanco, Swathi Adinarayanan, Javier Vargas, Dong Si

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. IUCrJ · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Todor Kirilov AvramovComputing and Software Systems, University of Washington, Bothell, WA 98011, USA. tavramov@uw.edu.
Dan VyenieloComputing and Software Systems, University of Washington, Bothell, WA 98011, USA. dvnlo@uw.edu.
Josue Gomez-BlancoDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada. josue.gomez-blanco@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6168-3859
Swathi AdinarayananDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada. swathi.adinarayanan@mail.mcgill.ca.
Javier VargasDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada. javier.vargasbalbuena@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7519-6106
Dong SiComputing and Software Systems, University of Washington, Bothell, WA 98011, USA. dongsi@uw.edu.

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies NC-253837Graduate Research Award of Computing and Software Systems, University of Washington Bothell 74-0525Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2018-04813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is becoming the imaging method of choice for determining protein structures. Many atomic structures have been resolved based on an exponentially growing number of published three-dimensional (3D) high resolution cryo-EM density maps. However, the resolution value claimed for the reconstructed 3D density map has been the topic of scientific debate for many years. The Fourier Shell Correlation (FSC) is the currently accepted cryo-EM resolution measure, but it can be subjective, manipulated, and has its own limitations. In this study, we first propose supervised deep learning methods to extract representative 3D features at high, medium and low resolutions from simulated protein density maps and build classification models that objectively validate resolutions of experimental 3D cryo-EM maps. Specifically, we build classification models based on dense artificial neural network (DNN) and 3D convolutional neural network (3D CNN) architectures. The trained models can classify a given 3D cryo-EM density map into one of three resolution levels: high, medium, low. The preliminary DNN and 3D CNN models achieved 92.73% accuracy and 99.75% accuracy on simulated test maps, respectively. Applying the DNN and 3D CNN models to thirty experimental cryo-EM maps achieved an agreement of 60.0% and 56.7%, respectively, with the author published resolution value of the density maps. We further augment these previous techniques and present preliminary results of a 3D U-Net model for local resolution classification. The model was trained to perform voxel-wise classification of 3D cryo-EM density maps into one of ten resolution classes, instead of a single global resolution value. The U-Net model achieved 88.3% and 94.7% accuracy when evaluated on experimental maps with local resolutions determined by MonoRes and ResMap methods, respectively. Our results suggest deep learning can potentially improve the resolution evaluation process of experimental cryo-EM maps.

Indexed as

Cryoelectron MicroscopyImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsSupervised Machine LearningProteinscomputational structural biologycryo-electron microscopydeep learningresolution validation

Identifiers

PMID30917528
PMCPMC6471695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.