ArticleNutrients2019
Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences.
Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of colonic distension on small bowel motility measured by jejunal high-resolution manometry.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022Trial
- Trial
- The Effect of Soluble Fiber Dextrin on Subjective and Physiological Markers of Appetite: A Randomized Trial.Nutrients · 2020Trial
- Evaluation of toxicity and anti-amylase activity of 7, 8 dihydroxy coumarin (Daphnetin), a novel α-amylase blockerToxicology reports · 2025Article
- Nut and seed consumption is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome in females but not males: findings from the 2005-2018 NHANES data.European journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Sex as an independent variable in the measurement of satiation: a retrospective cohort study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2022Article
- Article
- Do Sex Differences in Physiology Confer a Female Advantage in Ultra-Endurance Sport?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Review
- Gastrointestinal Contributions to the Postprandial Experience.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Functional Dyspepsia: A Narrative Review With a Focus on Sex-Gender Differences.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2020Review
- Sex Differences and Commonalities in the Impact of a Palatable Meal on Thalamic and Insular Connectivity.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Food, Eating, and the Gastrointestinal Tract.Nutrients · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In a previous study, we demonstrated that women enjoyed and tolerated lower meal loads than men. Hence, we hypothesized that with the same meal load, their postprandial response is more pronounced than in men. We performed a randomized parallel trial in 12 women and 12 men comparing the postprandial responses to a palatable comfort meal. We measured homeostatic sensations (hunger/satiety, fullness) and hedonic sensations (digestive well-being, mood) on 10 cm scales, vagal tone by heart ratio variability and the metabolomic profile before and after meal ingestion. Gender differences were analyzed by repeated measures ANCOVA. Overall (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.