Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917492›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Comparing the Effects of Road, Railway, and Aircraft Noise on Sleep: Exposure⁻Response Relationships from Pooled Data of Three Laboratory Studies.

Eva-Maria Elmenhorst, Barbara Griefahn, Vinzent Rolny, Mathias Basner

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Urban Noise and Psychological Distress: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Traffic Noise and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating the Impact of Metro Interior Noise on Passenger Annoyance: An Experimental Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva-Maria ElmenhorstInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), 51170 Cologne, Germany. eva-maria.elmenhorst@dlr.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0336-6705
Barbara GriefahnLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, 44139 Dortmund, Germany. barbara.griefahn@udo.edu.
Vinzent RolnyInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), 51170 Cologne, Germany. vinzent.rolny@roche.com.
Mathias BasnerInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), 51170 Cologne, Germany. basner@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8453-0812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAir, road, and railway traffic, the three major sources of traffic noise, have been reported to differently impact on annoyance. However, these findings may not be transferable to physiological reactions during sleep which are considered to decrease nighttime recovery and might mediate long-term negative health effects. Studies on awakenings from sleep indicate that railway noise, while having the least impact on annoyance, may have the most disturbing properties on sleep compared to aircraft noise. This study presents a comparison between the three major traffic modes and their probability to cause awakenings. In combining acoustical and polysomnographical data from three laboratory studies sample size and generalizability of the findings were increased.

methodsData from three laboratory studies were pooled, conducted at two sites in Germany (German Aerospace Center, Cologne, and Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund). In total, the impact of 109,836 noise events on polysomnographically assessed awakenings was analyzed in 237 subjects using a random intercept logistic regression model.

resultsThe best model fit according to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) included different acoustical and sleep parameters. After adjusting for these moderators results showed that the probability to wake up from equal maximum A-weighted sound pressure levels (SPL) increased in the order aircraft < road < railway noise, the awakening probability from road and railway noise being not significantly different (

conclusionsThe three major traffic noise sources differ in their impact on sleep. The order with which their impact increased was inversed compared to the order that was found in annoyance surveys. It is thus important to choose the correct concept for noise legislation, i.e., physiological sleep metrics in addition to noise annoyance for nighttime noise protection.

Indexed as

SleepAcousticsAdultAgedAircraftEnvironmental ExposureFemaleGermanyHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMotor VehiclesNoise, TransportationPolysomnographyRailroadsaircraft noiseawakeningexposure–response curvenoise legislationrailway noiseroad traffic noisesleep

Identifiers

PMID30917492
PMCPMC6466444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.