Trial reportPloS one2019
Genistein treatment duration effects biomarkers of cell motility in human prostate.
Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reactivation of the silencedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Advancement in nanocarrier-mediated delivery of herbal bioactives: from bench to beside.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2025Review
- RNA-Seq Uncovers Association of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals with Hub Genes and Transcription Factors in Aggressive Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Prolonged Low-Dose Administration of FDA-Approved Drugs for Non-Cancer Conditions: A Review of Potential Targets in Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Plant- and Marine-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Prostate Cancer: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Anticancer Plant Secondary Metabolites Evicting Linker Histone H1.2 from Chromatin Activate Type I Interferon Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Genistein: Insights into Multifaceted Mechanisms and Perspectives for Human Wellness.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Anticancer Plant Secondary Metabolites Induce Linker Histone Depletion from Chromatin.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2024Article
- The Pros and Cons of Estrogens in Prostate Cancer: An Update with a Focus on Phytoestrogens.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Isoflavonoid metabolism in leguminous plants: an update and perspectives.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- MKK4 Inhibitors-Recent Development Status and Therapeutic Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Eat4Genes: a bioinformatic rational gene targeting app and prototype model for improving human health.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Review
- Genistein as a regulator of signaling pathways and microRNAs in different types of cancers.Cancer cell international · 2021Review
- Prostate cancer: Therapeutic prospect with herbal medicine.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2021Review
- Genistein: An Integrative Overview of Its Mode of Action, Pharmacological Properties, and Health Benefits.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Review
- The role of FOXOs and autophagy in cancer and metastasis-Implications in therapeutic development.Medicinal research reviews · 2020Review
- Dietary Flavonoids in p53-Mediated Immune Dysfunctions Linking to Cancer Prevention.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- Non-'classical' MEKs: A review of MEK3-7 inhibitors.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2020Review
- Flavonoids in Cancer Metastasis.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLong term dietary consumption of genistein by Chinese men is associated with decreased PCa metastasis and mortality. Short term treatment of US men with prostate cancer (PCa) with genistein decreases MMP-2 in prostate tissue. MEK4 regulates MMP-2 expression, drives PCa metastasis, and genistein inhibits MEK4, decreases MMP-2 expression and dietary dosing inhibits human PCa metastasis in mice. This study examines short- versus long-term treatment effects of genistein in humans and in vitro. METHODS AND
findingsUS men with localized PCa were treated on a phase II trial with genistein (N = 14) versus not (N = 14) for one month prior to radical prostatectomy. Prostate epithelial cells were removed from fresh frozen tissue by laser capture microdissection, and the expression of 12,000 genes profiled. Genistein significantly altered the expression of four genes, three had established links to cancer cell motility and metastasis. Of these three, one was a non-coding transcript, and the other two were BASP1 and HCF2. Genistein increased BASP1 expression in humans, and its engineered over expression and knockdown demonstrated that it suppressed cell invasion in all six human prostate cell lines examined. Genistein decreased HCF2 expression in humans, and it was shown to increase cell invasion in all cell lines examined. The expression of MMP-2, MEK4 and BASP1 was then measured in formalin fixed prostate tissue from N = 38 Chinese men living in China and N = 41 US men living in the US, both cohorts with localized PCa. MMP-2 was 52% higher in Chinese compared to US tissue (P < 0.0001), MEK4 was 48% lower (P < 0.0001), and BASP1 was unaltered. Treatment of PC3 human PCa cells in vitro for up to 8 weeks demonstrated that short term genistein treatment decreased MMP-2, while long term treatment increased it, both changes being significant (P<0.05) compared to untreated control cells. Long term genistein-treated cells retained their responsiveness to genistein's anti-motility effect.
conclusionsGenistein inhibits pathways in human prostate that drive transformation to a lethal high motility phenotype. Long term treatment induces compensatory changes in biomarkers of efficacy. The current strategy of using such biomarkers after short term intervention as go/no-go determinants in early phase chemoprevention trials should be carefully examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.