ArticlePloS one2019
A fully-automated, robust, and versatile algorithm for long-term budding yeast segmentation and tracking.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Love-thy-neighbor: Neural networks for tracking and lineage tracing in budding yeast.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Love-thy-neighbor: neural networks for tracking and lineage tracing in budding yeast.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- DeepKymoTracker: A tool for accurate construction of cell lineage trees for highly motile cells.PloS one · 2025Article
- Fitness cost associated with cell phenotypic switching drives population diversification dynamics and controllability.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Determining growth rates from bright-field images of budding cells through identifying overlaps.eLife · 2023Article
- When yeast cells change their mind: cell cycle "Start" is reversible under starvation.The EMBO journal · 2023Article
- Cell region fingerprints enable highly precise single-cell tracking and lineage reconstruction.Nature methods · 2022Article
- Segmentation, tracking and cell cycle analysis of live-cell imaging data with Cell-ACDC.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Live cell microscopy: From image to insight.Biophysics reviews · 2022Review
- Cdc14 spatiotemporally dephosphorylates Atg13 to activate autophagy during meiotic divisions.The Journal of cell biology · 2022Article
- A convolutional neural network for segmentation of yeast cells without manual training annotations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Cell cycle-independent integration of stress signals by Xbp1 promotes Non-G1/G0 quiescence entry.The Journal of cell biology · 2022Article
- Nutrient Signaling, Stress Response, and Inter-organelle Communication Are Non-canonical Determinants of Cell Fate.Cell reports · 2020Article
- A convolutional neural network segments yeast microscopy images with high accuracy.Nature communications · 2020Article
- DeLTA: Automated cell segmentation, tracking, and lineage reconstruction using deep learning.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Live cell time-lapse microscopy, a widely-used technique to study gene expression and protein dynamics in single cells, relies on segmentation and tracking of individual cells for data generation. The potential of the data that can be extracted from this technique is limited by the inability to accurately segment a large number of cells from such microscopy images and track them over long periods of time. Existing segmentation and tracking algorithms either require additional dyes or markers specific to segmentation or they are highly specific to one imaging condition and cell morphology and/or necessitate manual correction. Here we introduce a fully automated, fast and robust segmentation and tracking algorithm for budding yeast that overcomes these limitations. Full automatization is achieved through a novel automated seeding method, which first generates coarse seeds, then automatically fine-tunes cell boundaries using these seeds and automatically corrects segmentation mistakes. Our algorithm can accurately segment and track individual yeast cells without any specific dye or biomarker. Moreover, we show how existing channels devoted to a biological process of interest can be used to improve the segmentation. The algorithm is versatile in that it accurately segments not only cycling cells with smooth elliptical shapes, but also cells with arbitrary morphologies (e.g. sporulating and pheromone treated cells). In addition, the algorithm is independent of the specific imaging method (bright-field/phase) and objective used (40X/63X/100X). We validate our algorithm's performance on 9 cases each entailing a different imaging condition, objective magnification and/or cell morphology. Taken together, our algorithm presents a powerful segmentation and tracking tool that can be adapted to numerous budding yeast single-cell studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.