Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30917092›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2019

When Does One Decide How Heavy an Object Feels While Picking It Up?

Myrthe A Plaisier, Irene A Kuling, Eli Brenner, Jeroen B J Smeets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Myrthe A PlaisierDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Irene A KulingDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Eli BrennerDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Jeroen B J SmeetsDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.ORCID 0000-0002-3794-0579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When lifting an object, it takes time to decide how heavy it is. How does this weight judgment develop? To answer this question, we examined when visual size information has to be present to induce a size-weight illusion. We found that a short glimpse (200 ms) of size information is sufficient to induce a size-weight illusion. The illusion occurred not only when the glimpse was before the onset of lifting but also when the object's weight could already be felt. Only glimpses more than 300 ms after the onset of lifting did not influence the judged weight. This suggests that it takes about 300 ms to reach a perceptual decision about the weight.

Indexed as

Size PerceptionWeight PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansIllusionsMaleMechanical PhenomenaWeight LiftingYoung Adultmultisensory perceptionperceptual decision makingsize-weight illusiontime dependency

Identifiers

PMID30917092
PMCPMC6560521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.