Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30916742›Full record

Trial reportJAMA surgery2019

Combined Surgery and Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage vs Surgery Alone for Treatment of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The SEIPLUS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jing Guo, Aman Xu, Xiaowei Sun, Xuhui Zhao, Yabin Xia, Huamin Rao, Yaming Zhang, Rupeng Zhang, Li Chen, Tao Zhang and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02745509 (A Prospective, Multicentral, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Investigation the Value of Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage After Curative Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02745509 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicentral, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Investigation the Value of Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage After Curative Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2016 to 2017Enrolled508ConditionsGastric CancerArmsExtensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Extended intraoperative peritoneal lavage as prophylactic peritoneal recurrence for locally advanced gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Removal of small extracellular vesicles inhibits the progression of peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Jing GuoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, and Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Aman XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, HeFei, Anhui, China.
Xiaowei SunState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, and Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xuhui ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yabin XiaDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Huamin RaoDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Jiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yaming ZhangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, Anhui, China.
Rupeng ZhangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, Tianjin, China.
Li ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Tao ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Gang LiDepartment of General Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Hongtao XuDepartment of General Surgery, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, Zhejiang, China.
Dazhi XuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, and Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNAnhui Medical University · CNAnqing City Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College · CNJiangsu Cancer Hospital · CNJiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital · CNLishui Central Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNShantou University · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Peritoneal metastasis is the most frequent pattern of postoperative recurrence in patients with gastric cancer. Extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) is a new prophylactic strategy for treatment of peritoneal metastasis of locally advanced gastric cancer; however, the safety and efficacy of EIPL is currently unknown. Objective: To evaluate short-term outcomes of patients with advanced gastric cancer who received combined surgery and EIPL or surgery alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: From March 2016 to November 2017, 662 patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving D2 gastrectomy were enrolled in a large, multicenter, randomized clinical trial from 11 centers across China. In total, 329 patients were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone, and 333 patients were randomly assigned to receive surgery plus EIPL. Clinical characteristics, operative findings, and postoperative short-term outcomes were compared between the 2 groups in the intent-to-treat population. Main Outcomes and Measures: Short-term postoperative complications and mortality. Results: The present analysis included data from 550 patients, 390 men and 160 women, with a mean (SD) age of 60.8 (10.7) years in the surgery alone group and 60.6 (10.8) in the surgery plus EIPL group. Patients assigned to the surgery plus EIPL group exhibited reduced mortality (0 of 279 patients) compared with those assigned to surgery alone (5 of 271 patients [1.9%]) (difference, 1.9%; 95% CI, 0.3%-3.4%; P = .02). A significant difference in the overall postoperative complication rate was observed between patients receiving surgery alone (46 patients [17.0%]) and those receiving surgery plus EIPL (31 patients [11.1%]) (difference, 5.9%; 95% CI, 0.1%-11.6%; P = .04). Postoperative pain occurred more often following surgery alone (48 patients [17.7%]) than following surgery plus EIPL (30 patients [10.8%]) (difference, 7.0%; 95% CI, 0.8%-13.1%; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Inclusion of EIPL can increase the safety of D2 gastrectomy and decrease postoperative short-term complications and wound pain. As a new, safe, and simple procedure, EIPL therapy is easily performed anywhere and does not require any special devices or techniques. Our study suggests that patients with advanced gastric cancer appear to be candidates for the EIPL approach. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02745509.

Indexed as

Neoplasm StagingChinaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansIncidenceIntraoperative PeriodMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal LavagePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID30916742
PMCPMC6583840
OpenAlexW2924012394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.