SynthesisJAMA dermatology2019
Application of Topical Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors in Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and safety of topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema: network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- What are the highest yielding search strategy terms for systematic reviews in atopic dermatitis? A systematic review.Archives of dermatological research · 2021Pooled it
- Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for Nrf2-Associated Skin Disorders: From Photoaging to Autoimmunity.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of PDE4 inhibitor monotherapy in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2026Review
- Antisense molecules: A promising new therapy for atopic dermatitis.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Atopic Dermatitis Management: from Conventional Therapies to Biomarker-Driven Treatment Approaches.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Topical Treatments for Patients with Atopic Dermatitis.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Review
- Palmoplantar Pustulosis as an Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease with a Possible Relevance of Th17 Cell Plasticity: A Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Review
- Article
- Atopic dermatitis: a comprehensive updated review of this intriguing disease with futuristic insights.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- An Overview of Atopic Dermatitis Disease Burden, Pathogenesis, and the Current Treatment Landscape: Recommendations for Appropriate Utilization of Systemic Therapies.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Review
- JAK 1-3 inhibitors and TYK-2 inhibitors in dermatology: Practical pearls for the primary care physician.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Review
- Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children.Cureus · 2024Review
- Efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib, Crisaborole, and Tapinarof for mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: a Bayesian network analysis of RCTs.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Review
- PDE4D and miR-203 are promising biomarkers for canine atopic dermatitis.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Topical Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis: An Expansive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- Dermatologists' Perceptions and Factors Influencing the Selection of Topical Anti-Inflammatory Agents for Atopic Dermatitis in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Article
- Exploring the Complexities of Atopic Dermatitis: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches.Journal of biotechnology and biomedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Topical medication is the central treatment for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), but the options are limited. Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors are a new candidate for AD therapy. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical PDE4 inhibitors in mild to moderate AD. Data Sources: Clinical trials were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, Chinese medical databases (Wanfang, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database), ClinicalTrials.gov, and other trial registries from inception to August 15, 2018. No restrictions on languages were placed. Study Selection: Only double-blind randomized clinical trials with topical PDE4 inhibitors vs topical vehicle treatment for patients with mild to moderate AD were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted study features, intervention details, and outcomes. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Funnel plots and Egger tests were used to assess the publication bias. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes from baseline in target lesion score were expressed in terms of standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs. Outcomes of investigators' assessment and safety were expressed in terms of relative risk with 95% CIs. Results: Seven studies were identified, which included 1869 patients with mild to moderate AD. Overall, compared with the topical vehicle control, topical application of PDE4 inhibitors was associated with a significant decrease in target lesion score (SMD -0.40; 95% CI, -0.61 to -0.18; P < .001) and a higher response rate in investigators' assessment of clear or almost clear skin (relative risk, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.33-1.70; P < .001). There was no difference in treatment-related adverse events or in adverse events that required discontinuation of therapy. Subgroup analyses indicated that after 14 and 28 days of therapy with PDE4 inhibitors, target lesion score was significantly decreased. However, these beneficial effects were displayed only for the PDE4 inhibitors crisaborole and AN2898 (crisaborole at day 14: SMD, -0.59; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.02; P = .04; AN2898 at day 14: SMD, -0.76; 95% CI, -1.38 to -0.13; P = .02; crisaborole at day 28: SMD, -0.86; 95% CI, -1.44 to -0.28; P = .004; AN2898 at day 28: SMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.30 to -0.05; P = .03). Heterogeneity was not significant across studies. Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis suggests that topical PDE4 inhibitors are a safe and effective treatment for mild to moderate AD. Current evidence supports the use of crisaborole or AN2898 as the choice of maintenance or sequential therapy for mild to moderate AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.